Update in Paravalvular Leak Closure
- PMID: 34269898
- DOI: 10.1007/s11886-021-01552-w
Update in Paravalvular Leak Closure
Abstract
Purpose of review: Given the low occurrence of clinically important paravalvular leak (PVL), there are no large registries or trials in this space to investigate management strategies. This review integrates newer evidence, particularly in imaging guidance for these complex procedures, novel techniques and approaches that our group has taken, as well as approaches to more complex PVL plugging reported in case reports.
Recent findings: Perhaps the largest area of growth in the management of PVL is the use of advanced imaging in both pre-procedure evaluation and intra-procedural guidance with gated cardiac CT, 3D TEE, and fluoroscopy fusion technologies. Outside the USA, a new device, the Occlutech PLD, has become available with early data indicating high success rates. There remains little randomized data to support the efficacy of percutaneous PVL closure. Gated cardiac CT has become key to the pre-procedure evaluation for transcatheter closure as it allows for increased procedural efficiency and more accurate pre-procedure planning, particularly when combined with 3D printing. Intra-procedural TEE-fluoro fusion allows for more rapid crossing of defects by providing a visual target for interventionalists. The advent of purpose-built devices for PVL closure may further increase the efficacy and efficiency of percutaneous closure, but significant barriers remain for approval of these devices in the USA.
Keywords: PVL; Paravalvular leak; Paravalvular leak repair; Periprosthetic regurgitation; Transcatheter plugging.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
-
- Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368(9540):1005–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69208-8 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Carroll JD, Mack MJ, Vemulapalli S, Herrmann HC, Gleason TG, Hanzel G, et al. STS-ACC TVT registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(21):2492–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.595 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bowdish ME, D’Agostino RS, Thourani VH, Desai N, Shahian DM, Fernandez FG, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2020 update on outcomes and research. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(6):1646–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.03.003 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ruiz CE, Hahn RT, Berrebi A, Borer JS, Cutlip DE, Fontana G, et al. Clinical trial principles and endpoint definitions for paravalvular leaks in surgical prosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(16):2067–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.038 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hwang HY, Choi J-W, Kim H-K, Kim K-H, Kim K-B, Ahn H. Paravalvular leak after mitral valve replacement: 20-year follow-Up. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(4):1347–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.104 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials