Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Nov;110(5):1318-1328.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.2366. Epub 2021 Aug 24.

The Posology of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The Posology of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Atopic Dermatitis

Mohamed A Kamal et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Dupilumab demonstrated efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase III trials in adolescents (12-17 years; LIBERTY AD ADOL) and children (6-11 years; LIBERTY AD PEDS) with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated for 16 weeks. Here, we present the pharmacokinetic profiles and exposure-response (E-R) relationships of dupilumab that guided the posology in these populations. A total of 251 adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized to subcutaneous dupilumab monotherapy every 2 weeks (q2w; 200 mg q2w, baseline weight < 60 kg; 300 mg q2w, ≥ 60 kg), dupilumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w; non-weight tiered), or placebo; 367 children with severe AD were randomized to dupilumab q2w (100 mg q2w, baseline weight < 30 kg; 200 mg q2w, ≥ 30 kg), dupilumab 300 mg q4w, or placebo. Children received concomitant topical corticosteroids in addition to dupilumab, and loading doses were administered at the start of therapy. Mean dupilumab trough concentrations at week 16 for weight subcategories in each dosing regimen were compared with adult exposures for the approved dupilumab 300 mg q2w regimen. Positive E-R relationships were demonstrated between dupilumab trough concentrations and AD outcome measures across patient populations and regimens; no relationship was observed with treatment-emergent conjunctivitis. Based on these analyses, a weight-tiered posology was proposed for adolescents (200/300 mg q2w in patients 30-< 60 kg/≥ 60 kg) and children (300 mg q4w in patients 15-< 30 kg, 200 mg q2w in patients 30-< 60 kg) with moderate-to-severe AD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03054428 NCT03345914.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.A.K., P.K., M.P.K., K.S., Y.Z., M.R., C‐H.L., X.S., B.S., A.B., N.A‐H., and J.D.D. are employees and shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E.L.S. has been an advisor for Celgene and Merck; a consultant for Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Asubio, Celgene, Galderma, Genentech, Medicis Pharmaceutical, and Merck; and has received research support from Amgen, Celgene, Chugai, Galderma, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. A.S.P. has been a consultant for AbbVie, Abeona Therapeutics, Almirall, Asana BioSciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, BridgeBio, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Exicure, Forté, Incyte, InMed Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, LEO Pharma, LifeMax, Novartis, Pfizer, RAPT Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi Genzyme, Sol‐Gel, and UCB; has been on the data safety monitoring board of Bausch, Galderma, and Novan; and a Principal Investigator (funding to institution) for AbbVie, AnaptysBio, Eli Lilly, Incyte, Janssen, Lenus Pharma, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and UCB. E.C.S. has been a consultant for Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Verrica Pharmaceuticals; has been on the data safety monitoring board of GlaxoSmithKline, LEO Pharma, and Novan; and has been the Principal Investigator in clinical trials for Eli Lilly, Janssen, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Stiefel, and Verrica Pharmaceuticals. V.K. and C.X. are employees of and may hold stock options in Sanofi Genzyme.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (±SD) concentration‐time course of dupilumab by treatment‐weight group in (a) adolescents aged 12–17 and (b) children aged 6–11 years (PKAS). *US Food and Drug Administration approved doses. BLQs were set to 0. Nominal time points until week 16 were used for analysis. BLQ, below limit of quantification; PK, pharmacokinetics; PKAS, PK analysis set; q2w, every 2 weeks; q4w, every 4 weeks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Concentrations of functional dupilumab in serum at week 16 by body weight group and dose group in adults, adolescents aged 12–17 years, and children aged 6–11 years. Mean values: adults 300 mg q2w, 74.6 mg/L; adolescents 200 mg q2w < 60 kg, 51.3 mg/L; 300 mg q2w ≥ 60 kg, 57.9 mg/L; 300 mg q4w < 60 kg, 27.2 mg/L; 300 mg q4w ≥ 60 kg, 12.7 mg/L; children 100 mg q2w < 30 kg, 62.6 mg/L; 200 mg q2w ≥ 30 kg, 86.0 mg/L; 300 mg q4w < 30 kg, 98.7 mg/L; 300 mg q4w ≥ 30 kg, 53.9 mg/L. All dose regimens were compared to adults. *US Food and Drug Administration approved doses. Diamonds signify mean values; vertical lines extending from top to bottom are the maximum value below upper fence and minimum value above lower fence, respectively; circles are outliers defined by the “1.5 rule”, namely, when less than (Q1 – 1.5*IQR) or greater than (Q3 + 1.5*IQR), with IQR = Q3–Q1. Outliers above a concentration of 165 mg/L were removed from analysis to enable data visualization and comparison of dose regimens. BLQs were set to 0. Adults are patients in studies R668‐AD‐1334 and R668‐AD‐1416; adolescents are patients in study R668‐AD‐1526; and children (6–11 years) are patients in study R668‐AD‐1652. BLQ, below limit of quantification; IQR, interquartile range; 2qw, every 2 weeks; q4w, every 4 weeks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Exposure‐efficacy relationships. (a) Probability of response (proportions of patients with) for IGA 0 or 1 by week 16 dupilumab concentrations. (b) Probability of response (proportions of patients with) for EASI‐75 by week 16 concentrations. (c) Percentage change in EASI from baseline to week 16 vs. trough concentration (CRAS). (d) Percentage change in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from baseline to week 16 vs. Ctrough (CRAS). *US Food and Drug Administration approved doses. Outliers above concentrations of 165 mg/L were removed from analysis. BLQs were set to 0. BLQ, below limit of quantification; CRAS, concentration‐response analysis set; Ctrough, trough concentration; EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index; EASI‐75, ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in EASI; PK, pharmacokinetics; PKAS, PK analysis set; q2w, every 2 weeks; q4w, every 4 weeks. (a, b) Blue line = mean regression line, gray area = confidence area around regression line. (c, d) Blue line = locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS), gray area = 95% confidence interval.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Logistic regression analysis between events of conjunctivitis and concentration of dupilumab. *US Food and Drug Administration approved doses. Outliers above concentrations of 165 mg/L were removed from analysis. BLQs were set to 0. Blue line = mean regression line, gray area = confidence area around regression line. BLQ, below limit of quantification; Ctrough, trough concentration; q2w, every 2 weeks; q4w, every 4 weeks.

References

    1. Abuabara, K. , Yu, A.M. , Okhovat, J.‐P. , Allen, I.E. & Langan, S.M. The prevalence of atopic dermatitis beyond childhood: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of longitudinal studies. Allergy 73, 696–704 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shaw, T.E. , Currie, G.P. , Koudelka, C.W. & Simpson, E.L. Eczema prevalence in the United States: data from the 2003 National Survey of Children’s Health. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 67–73 (2011). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Odhiambo, J.A. , Williams, H.C. , Clayton, T.O. , Robertson, C.F. & Asher, M.I. & ISAAC Phase Three Study Group . Global variations in prevalence of eczema symptoms in children from ISAAC Phase Three. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 124, 1251–1258 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Wollenberg, A. et al. ETFAD/EADV eczema task force 2015 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult and paediatric patients. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 30, 729–747 (2016). - PubMed
    1. Sidbury, R. et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 71, 327–349 (2014). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data