Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;132(2):349-355.
doi: 10.1002/lary.29765. Epub 2021 Jul 17.

Initial Referring Physician and Radiologist Experience with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System

Paul M Bunch  1 , Nuwan T Meegalla  2 , Abdul-Rahman Abualruz  3 , Bart A Frizzell  4 , Hafiz S Patwa  5 , Mercedes Porosnicu  6 , Daniel W Williams 3rd  3 , Ashley H Aiken  7 , Ryan T Hughes  4
Affiliations

Initial Referring Physician and Radiologist Experience with Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System

Paul M Bunch et al. Laryngoscope. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a radiology reporting system developed for head and neck cancer surveillance imaging, using standardized terminology, numeric levels of suspicion, and linked management recommendations. Through a multidisciplinary, interdepartmental quality improvement initiative, we implemented NI-RADS for the reporting of head and neck cancer surveillance CT. Our objective is to summarize our initial experience from the standpoints of head and neck cancer providers and radiologists.

Study design: Quality improvement study.

Methods: Before and 3 months post-implementation, surveys were offered to referring physicians (n = 21 pre-adoption; 22 post-adoption) and radiologists (n = 17 pre- and post-adoption). NI-RADS utilization was assessed over time.

Results: Survey response rates were 62% (13/21) and 73% (16/22) for referring physicians pre- and post-adoption, respectively, and 94% (16/17) for radiologists pre- and post-adoption. Among post-adoption provider respondents, 100% (16/16) strongly agreed or agreed with "I want our radiologists to continue using NI-RADS," "The NI-RADS numerical rating of radiologic suspicion is helpful," and "The language and style of NI-RADS neck CT reports are clear and understandable." Among radiologist respondents, 88% (14/16) strongly agreed or agreed with "NI-RADS improves consistency among our radiologists in the reporting of surveillance neck CTs." Radiologist NI-RADS utilization increased over time (46% month 1; 72% month 3).

Conclusions: Most referring physicians and radiologists preferred NI-RADS. Head and neck cancer providers indicated that NI-RADS reports are clear, understandable, direct, and helpful in guiding clinical management. Radiologists indicated that NI-RADS improves radiologist consistency in the reporting of surveillance neck CT, and radiologists increasingly used NI-RADS over time.

Level of evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:349-355, 2022.

Keywords: Head and neck cancer; neck CT; quality improvement; structured reporting; surveillance imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Hoang JK, Riofrio A, Bashir MR, Kranz PG, Eastwood JD. High variability in radiologists' reporting practices for incidental thyroid nodules detected on CT and MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1190-1194. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3834.
    1. Mattoo TK, Skoog SJ, Gravens-Mueller L, et al. Interobserver variability for interpretation of DMSA scans in the RIVUR trial. J Pediatr Urol 2017;13:616.e1-616.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.040.
    1. He BJ, Malm BJ, Carino M, Sadeghi MM. Prevalence and variability in reporting of clinically actionable incidental findings on attenuation-correction CT scans in a veteran population. J Nucl Cardiol 2019;26:1688-1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1232-9.
    1. Shinagare AB, Lacson R, Boland GW, et al. Radiologist preferences, agreement, and variability in phrases used to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16:458-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.052.
    1. Schwarz S, Muckenhuber M, Benazzo A, et al. Interobserver variability impairs radiologic grading of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;158:955-962.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.134.