Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 17;7(1):143.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00878-0.

Protocol for mapping psychosocial screening to resources in pediatric oncology: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Leandra Desjardins  1 , Kelly Hancock  2 , Peter Szatmari  3 , Sarah Alexander  4 , Wendy Shama  4   5 , Claire De Souza  3 , Denise Mills  4 , Oussama Abla  4 , Maru Barrera  2   4
Affiliations

Protocol for mapping psychosocial screening to resources in pediatric oncology: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Leandra Desjardins et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: A pediatric cancer diagnosis and its treatment can have a detrimental effect on the mental health of children and their families. Screening to identify psychosocial risk in families has been recognized as a standard of care in pediatric oncology, but there has been limited clinical application of this standard thus far. A significant impediment to the implementation of psychosocial screening is the dearth of information on how to translate psychosocial screening to clinical practice, and specifically, how to follow-up from screening results. This manuscript aims to describe a protocol of a new intervention examining the feasibility and acceptability of mapping via a Psychosocial Navigator (PSN) psychosocial screening results to specific recommendations of resources for families based on measured risk for psychosocial distress and mental health symptoms.

Methods: The pilot randomized control trial (RCT) consists of dyads of youth (10-17 years) newly diagnosed with cancer and their primary caregiver. This RCT includes two arms (intervention and control group), with each group completing measurements near diagnosis and 1 year later. After the initial assessment, dyads in the intervention group receive monthly screening results and recommendations from the study PSN that are tailored to these results. The patient's primary healthcare team (nurse, social worker, oncologist) also receive the risk, distress, and mental health results as well as the recommendations from the PSN.

Discussion: This study addresses a significant barrier to the implementation of psychosocial screening in pediatric oncology: specifically, the limited knowledge of how to follow-up from screening results. Findings from this pilot will inform a future definitive RCT to test the effectiveness of the intervention on patient and family mental health outcomes. This project has implications for enhancing clinical care in pediatric oncology, as well as other pediatric populations.

Strengths and limitations of this study: This is the first study of screening and follow-up using a psychosocial navigator. This study involves both patient and caregiver report. The small sample size necessitates a future larger study to investigate the effects of intervention.

Trial registration: NCT04132856 , Registered 10 October 2019-retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Mental health; Pediatric oncology; Protocol; Psychosocial; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Pediatric Preventive Psychosocial Health Model (PPPHM)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT flow chart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Example of Baseline Communication Summary Profile for a Fictional Patient
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Example of Monthly Distress Thermometer Communication for a Fictional Patient
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Steliarova-Foucher E, Colombet M, Ries LAG, Moreno F, Dolva A, Bray F, et al. International incidence of childhood cancer, 2001-2010: a population-based registry study. Lancet. 2017;18(6):719–731. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30186-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kupst MJ, Patenaude AP. Coping and adaptation in pediatric cancer: Current perspectives. In: Abrams AN, Muriel AC, Wiener L, editors. Pediatric psychosocial oncology: Textbook for multidisciplinary care. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 67–79.
    1. Klassen AF, Raina P, McIntosh C, Sung L, Klaassen RJ, O'Donnell M, Yanofsky R, Dix D. Parents of children with cancer: which factors explain differences in health-related quality of life. Int J Cancer. 2011;129(5):1190–1198. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25737. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pinquart M, Shen Y. Behavior problems in children and adolescents with chronic physical illness: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2011;36(9):1003–1016. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsr042. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz LF, Fladeboe K, King K, Gurtovenko K, Friedman D, Compas B, et al. Trajectories of child and caregiver psychological adjustment in families of children with cancer. Health Psychol. 2018;37(8):725–735. doi: 10.1037/hea0000619. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data