Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jul;6(Suppl 4):e004543.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004543.

Does community-based distribution of HIV self-tests increase uptake of HIV testing? Results of pair-matched cluster randomised trial in Zambia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Does community-based distribution of HIV self-tests increase uptake of HIV testing? Results of pair-matched cluster randomised trial in Zambia

Melissa Neuman et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: Ending HIV by 2030 is a global priority. Achieving this requires alternative HIV testing strategies, such as HIV self-testing (HIVST) to reach all individuals with HIV testing services (HTS). We present the results of a trial evaluating the impact of community-based distribution of HIVST in community and facility settings on the uptake of HTS in rural and urban Zambia.

Design: Pair-matched cluster randomised trial.

Methods: In catchment areas of government health facilities, OraQuick HIVST kits were distributed by community-based distributors (CBDs) over 12 months in 2016-2017. Within matched pairs, clusters were randomised to receive the HIVST intervention or standard of care (SOC). Individuals aged ≥16 years were eligible for HIVST. Within communities, CBDs offered HIVST in high traffic areas, door to door and at healthcare facilities. The primary outcome was self-reported recent testing within the previous 12 months measured using a population-based survey.

Results: In six intervention clusters (population 148 541), 60 CBDs distributed 65 585 HIVST kits. A recent test was reported by 66% (1622/2465) in the intervention arm compared with 60% (1456/2429) in SOC arm (adjusted risk ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.24; p=0.15). Uptake of the HIVST intervention was low: 24% of respondents in the intervention arm (585/2493) used an HIVST kit in the previous 12 months. No social harms were identified during implementation.

Conclusion: Despite distributing a large number of HIVST kits, we found no evidence that this community-based HIVST distribution intervention increased HTS uptake. Other models of HIVST distribution, including secondary distribution and community-designed distribution models, provide alternative strategies to reach target populations.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02793804).

Keywords: Cluster randomised trial; HIV; community-based survey; public health; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests. The contents in this article arethose of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the WorldHealth Organization.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram showing flow of study participants. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; HIVST, HIV self-testing.

References

    1. UNAIDS . Accelerating towards 90–90–90. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2018.
    1. UNAIDS . Global AIDS update 2019 — communities at the centre. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2019.
    1. ICAP . Zambia population-based HIV impact assessment. Karachi: ICAP, 2016.
    1. World Health Organization . Consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization, UNAIDS . Guidance on provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling in health facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007.

Publication types

Associated data