Lithium-Metal Batteries Using Sustainable Electrolyte Media and Various Cathode Chemistries
- PMID: 34276126
- PMCID: PMC8279017
- DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00927
Lithium-Metal Batteries Using Sustainable Electrolyte Media and Various Cathode Chemistries
Abstract
Lithium-metal batteries employing concentrated glyme-based electrolytes and two different cathode chemistries are herein evaluated in view of a safe use of the highly energetic alkali-metal anode. Indeed, diethylene-glycol dimethyl-ether (DEGDME) and triethylene-glycol dimethyl-ether (TREGDME) dissolving lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) and lithium nitrate (LiNO3) in concentration approaching the solvents saturation limit are used in lithium batteries employing either a conversion sulfur-tin composite (S:Sn 80:20 w/w) or a Li+ (de)insertion LiFePO4 cathode. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) clearly show the suitability of the concentrated electrolytes in terms of process reversibility and low interphase resistance, particularly upon a favorable activation. Galvanostatic measurements performed on lithium-sulfur (Li/S) batteries reveal promising capacities at room temperature (25 °C) and a value as high as 1300 mAh gS -1 for the cell exploiting the DEGDME-based electrolyte at 35 °C. On the other hand, the lithium-LiFePO4 (Li/LFP) cells exhibit satisfactory cycling behavior, in particular when employing an additional reduction step at low voltage cutoff (i.e., 1.2 V) during the first discharge to consolidate the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). This procedure allows a Coulombic efficiency near 100%, a capacity approaching 160 mAh g-1, and relevant retention particularly for the cell using the TREGDME-based electrolyte. Therefore, this work suggests the use of concentrated glyme-based electrolytes, the fine-tuning of the operative conditions, and the careful selection of active materials chemistry as significant steps to achieve practical and safe lithium-metal batteries.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Figures






References
-
- Lu L.; Han X.; Li J.; Hua J.; Ouyang M. A Review on the Key Issues for Lithium-Ion Battery Management in Electric Vehicles. J. Power Sources 2013, 226, 272–288. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060. - DOI
-
- Di Lecce D.; Verrelli R.; Hassoun J. Lithium-Ion Batteries for Sustainable Energy Storage: Recent Advances towards New Cell Configurations. Green Chem. 2017, 19 (15), 3442–3467. 10.1039/C7GC01328K. - DOI
-
- Scrosati B.; Garche J. Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future. J. Power Sources 2010, 195 (9), 2419–2430. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048. - DOI
-
- Varzi A.; Thanner K.; Scipioni R.; Di Lecce D.; Hassoun J.; Dörfler S.; Altheus H.; Kaskel S.; Prehal C.; Freunberger S. A. Current Status and Future Perspectives of Lithium Metal Batteries. J. Power Sources 2020, 480, 228803.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228803. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous