Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;18(1):137-143.
doi: 10.1007/s13178-020-00437-x. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

Support for Transgender Military Service from Active Duty United States Military Personnel

Shannon L Dunlap  1 , Ian W Holloway  1 , Chad E Pickering  2   3 , Michael Tzen  3 , Jeremy T Goldbach  4 , Carl Andrew Castro  4
Affiliations

Support for Transgender Military Service from Active Duty United States Military Personnel

Shannon L Dunlap et al. Sex Res Social Policy. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Most transgender individuals are banned from serving in and joining the U.S. military. Historically, exclusions and limits have been placed on women, people of color, and sexual minority people seeking to serve and advance within the U.S. military. However, both history and prior research demonstrate that diversity contributes to social and institutional advancement within both U.S. and international militaries.

Methods: We used an adapted respondent-driven sampling (RDS) approach to recruit transgender and cisgender heterosexual and LGB active duty military members in a first-of-its-kind study funded by the Department of Defense. We recruited 540 active duty service members serving one of the four major branches of the U.S. military between August 2017 and March 2018. We examined data from 486 heterosexual cisgender and LGB cisgender service members to understand their support for transgender people serving in the U.S. military.

Results: Findings indicate broad support for transgender military service across all four branches of the military and military ranks, with some statistically significant differences in support emerging by gender, sexual orientation, and race/ethnicity.

Discussion: Results suggest that the ban, in part, based on a belief that transgender service members degrade unit readiness, contradicts our findings of broad support for transgender service among active duty service members.

Policy implications: Policies limiting transgender service in the U.S. military should be lifted given these data.

Keywords: Diversity; LGBT; Military; Policy; Transgender Military Service; Transgender Military Support.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alford B, & Lee SJ (2016). Toward complete inclusion: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender military service members after repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t tell. Social Work, 61(3), 257–265. 10.1093/sw/sww033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belkin A, Ender MG, Frank N, Furia SR, Lucas G, Packard G, et al. (2013). Readiness and DADT repeal: Has the new policy of open service undermined the military? Armed Forces & Society, 39(4), 587–601. 10.1177/0095327X12466248. - DOI
    1. Bérubé A (2010). Coming out under fire: The history of gay men and women in World War II. North Carolina: Univ of North Carolina Press.
    1. Blakemore E (2019, February 26). How women fought their way into the U.S. Armed Forces. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/news/women-fought-armed-forces-war-service . Accessed 22 June 2019.
    1. Burks DJ (2011). Lesbian, gay, and bisexual victimization in the military: An unintended consequence of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”? American Psychologist, 66(7), 604–613. 10.1037/a0024609. - DOI - PubMed