Bibliometric Reports for Institutions: Best Practices in a Responsible Metrics Scenario
- PMID: 34278205
- PMCID: PMC8278232
- DOI: 10.3389/frma.2021.696470
Bibliometric Reports for Institutions: Best Practices in a Responsible Metrics Scenario
Abstract
Carrying out bibliometric reports is one of the common tasks performed by librarians and practitioners within the framework of their professional duties. The emergence of novel data sources, the need to measure new research activities and the growing demand for fairer and more equitable evaluation within the framework of the Responsible Metrics movement has led to calls for a review of the traditional approaches to these types of reports. The main goal of this study is to outline a series of recommendations for bibliometricians, consultants and research support librarians when drafting bibliometric reports in their institutions. These best practices can significantly enhance the quality and utility of bibliometric reports, posing their practitioners as key players in the science management process.
Keywords: Responsible metrics; Responsible research and innovation; best practices; bibliometrics; reports.
Copyright © 2021 Cabezas-Clavijo and Torres-Salinas.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (2019). Bibliometric Report of the Scientific Production Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST). Available at: https://bist.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/4b.-Informe-de-Bibliometria.pdf(Accessed June 11, 2021)
-
- Bornmann L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the Broader Impact of Research? an Overview of Benefits and Disadvantages of Altmetrics. J. Informetrics 8, 895–903. 10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005 - DOI
-
- Colledge L. (2017). Snowball Metrics Recipe Book. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/53169/Snowball_Metr... (Accessed April 5, 2021)
-
- Coombs S. K., Peters I. (2017). The Leiden Manifesto under Review: what Libraries Can Learn from it. Dlp 33, 324–338. 10.1108/DLP-01-2017-0004 - DOI
-
- Costas R. (2008). Análisis bibliométrico de la actividad científica de los investigadores del CSIC en tres áreas, Biología y Biomedicina, Ciencia de los Materiales y Recursos Naturales: una aproximación metodológica a nivel micro (Web of Science, 1994-2004) [Doctoral dissertation]. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; ).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
