Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;27(2):390-405.
doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12550. Epub 2021 Jul 18.

Pro-vaccination subjective norms moderate the relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions

Affiliations

Pro-vaccination subjective norms moderate the relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions

Kevin Winter et al. Br J Health Psychol. 2022 May.

Abstract

Objectives: Increasing vaccination hesitancy threatens societies' capacity to contain pandemics and other diseases. One factor that is positively associated with vaccination intentions is a supportive subjective norm (i.e., the perception that close others approve of vaccination). On the downside, there is evidence that negative attitudes toward vaccinations are partly rooted in conspiracy mentality (i.e., the tendency to believe in conspiracies). The objective of this study is to examine the role of subjective norms in moderating the association between conspiracy mentality and vaccine hesitancy. We examined two competing predictions: Are those high in conspiracy mentality immune to subjective norms, or do subjective norms moderate the relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions?

Methods: We conducted five studies (total N = 1,280) to test these hypotheses across several vaccination contexts (some real, some fictitious). We measured conspiracy mentality, vaccination intentions, subjective norms, attitudes toward vaccination, and perceived behavioural control.

Results: A merged analysis across the studies revealed an interaction effect of conspiracy mentality and subjective norm on vaccination intentions. When subjective norm was high (i.e., when participants perceived that close others approved of vaccines) conspiracy mentality no longer predicted vaccination intentions. This was consistent with the moderating hypothesis of subjective norms and inconsistent with the immunity hypothesis.

Conclusions: The typical negative relationship between conspiracy mentality and vaccination intentions is eliminated among those who perceive pro-vaccination subjective norms. Although correlational, these data raise the possibility that pro-vaccination views of friends and family can be leveraged to reduce vaccine hesitancy.

Keywords: conspiracy mentality; subjective norm; theory of planned behaviour; vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flowchart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Vaccination intention as a function of subjective norm and conspiracy mentality (merged analysis: N = 1,280). Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T - DOI
    1. Banas, J. A. , & Miller, G. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 39, 184–207. 10.1111/hcre.12000 - DOI
    1. Chen, L. , Zhang, Y. , Young, R. , Wu, X. , & Zhu, G. (2020). Effects of vaccine‐related conspiracy theories on Chinese young adults’ perceptions of the HPV vaccine: An experimental study. Health Communication, 1–11, 10.1080/10410236.2020.1751384 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cialdini, R. B. , Kallgren, C. A. , & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201–234.
    1. Cook, J. , Lewandowsky, S. , & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence. PLoS One, 12, 1–21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175799 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types