Effect of SAcubitril/Valsartan on left vEntricular ejection fraction and on the potential indication for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in primary prevention: the SAVE-ICD study
- PMID: 34279677
- DOI: 10.1007/s00228-021-03189-8
Effect of SAcubitril/Valsartan on left vEntricular ejection fraction and on the potential indication for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in primary prevention: the SAVE-ICD study
Abstract
Purpose: Sacubitril/valsartan has been associated with a positive reverse left ventricular remodelling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). These patients may also benefit from an ICD implant. We aimed to assess EF improvement after 6 months of treatment with sacubitril/valsartan, evaluating when ICD as primary prevention was no longer indicated.
Methods: Multicentre, observational, prospective study enrolling all consecutive patients with HFrEF and EF ≤ 35% with an ICD as primary prevention and starting treatment with sacubitril/valsartan (NCT03935087). Resynchronization therapy and patients experiencing appropriate ICD therapies before sacubitril/valsartan were excluded.
Results: Two-hundred-and-thirty patients were enrolled (73.9% males, mean age 64.3 ± 12.1 years) After 6 months of treatment, a reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes was noted and LVEF increased from 28.3 ± 5.6% to 32.2 ± 6.5% (p < 0.001). At 6 months, a non-ischemic aetiology of cardiomyopathy and a final dose of sacubitril/valsartan > 24/26 mg twice daily were associated with a higher probability of an absolute increase of > 5% in LVEF. A total of 5.3% of primary prevention patients still had an arrhythmic event in the first 6 months after treatment with sacubitril/valsartan started.
Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan improves systolic function in HFrEF, mainly due to reverse left ventricular remodelling. Improvement in EF after 6 months of treatment could help prevent ICD implantation in nearly one out of four patients, with important clinical and economic implications. However, the risk of sudden cardiac death in this recovered HFrEF population has not been thoroughly studied, and the present data should be interpreted only as hypothesis-generating.
Keywords: Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor; Heart failure; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Sacubitril/valsartan; Sudden cardiac death; Systolic function.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 37:2129–2200. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128 - DOI
-
- Bui AL, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC (2011) Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol 8:30–41 - DOI
-
- McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS et al (2014) Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 371:993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1409077 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Januzzi JL, Prescott MF, Butler J et al (2019) Effects of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor therapy on amino-terminal Pro-B-Type natriuretic peptide and cardiac remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the PROVE-HF Study. J Card Fail 25:937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.11.004 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
