Preparedness of countries to face COVID-19 pandemic crisis: Strategic positioning and factors supporting effective strategies of prevention of pandemic threats
- PMID: 34280421
- PMCID: PMC8284056
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111678
Preparedness of countries to face COVID-19 pandemic crisis: Strategic positioning and factors supporting effective strategies of prevention of pandemic threats
Abstract
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to generate a constant pandemic threat with new mutations of the viral agent (SARS-CoV-2) that create socioeconomic issues. One of the fundamental problems is the evaluation of the preparedness of countries to cope with COVID-19 pandemic crisis to detect and support factors associated with the reduction of mortality and the growth of vaccinations in society. The study here confronts this problem by developing two basic indexes, which measure the performance of countries to face pandemic threats. In particular, the Index r (as resilience) detects the countries having the best performance in the reduction of the negative impact of mortality related to COVID-19 pandemic and the Index p (as preparedness and prevention) assesses best-performer countries to support COVID-19 vaccinations in order to constrain future pandemic threats and support the recovery of socioeconomic systems. Index of resilience is a composite measure based on three indicators associated with COVID-19, given by average mortality, hospital occupancy and Intensive Care Units occupancy per 100 000 people, producing an overall score; Index of preparedness/prevention is a composite measure of two indicators related to COVID-19 vaccinations (i.e., doses of vaccines administered and total vaccinates per 100 000 people), producing also an overall score of performance. The application of these indexes on a case study of European countries, having a homogenous socioeconomic area, shows the strategic positioning of countries to cope with a major pandemic threat. Findings reveal that all countries have some weaknesses and no country has a high preparedness to cope with a major epidemic or pandemic. Moreover, results suggest that best-performer countries to cope with COVID-19 pandemic crisis have a smaller size of population and/or better public governance, associated with high expenditures in health system. These indexes can help policymakers for designing effective strategies to improve preparedness and prevention of countries to face future pandemic threats.
Keywords: Biological security; COVID-19; COVID-19 vaccine uptake; Coronavirus infections; Country monitoring; Crisis management; Governance; Health systems; Health systems resilience; Healthcare sector; Pandemic response; Population size; Preparedness; Preventing transmission; Public health; Public health capacity; Risk assessment; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination plan; Variants.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The author COCCIA MARIO declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Abuza Z. 2020. Explaining successful (and unsuccessful) COVID-19 responses in Southeast Asia. The diplomat.https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/explaining-successful-and-unsuccessfulco... Retrieved July 7, 2020, from.
-
- Ackoff R.L., Rovin S. Stanford University Press; Stanford: 2003. Redesigning Society.
-
- Angelopoulos A.N., Pathak R., Varma R., Jordan M.I. Harvard Data Science Review. 2020. On identifying and mitigating bias in the estimation of the COVID-19 case fatality rate. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
