Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 4;18(13):7165.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137165.

Complementary Feeding Methods-A Review of the Benefits and Risks

Nikki Boswell  1
Affiliations
Review

Complementary Feeding Methods-A Review of the Benefits and Risks

Nikki Boswell. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Complementary feeding methods have the potential to not only ensure a diet of nutritional adequacy but also promote optimal food-related behaviours and skills. While the complementary feeding practice known as baby-led weaning (BLW) has gained popularity, evidence supporting the potential benefits and/or risks for infant growth, development, and health warrants consideration. A review of 29 studies was conducted with findings indicating that parents who implement BLW typically have higher levels of education, breastfeed for longer, and differ in other personality traits. Fear of choking was an important factor in parents' decision not to implement BLW; however, this fear was not supported by the literature. Benefits of BLW included lower food fussiness, higher food enjoyment, lower food responsiveness, and higher satiety responsiveness. While this profile of eating behaviours confers a reduced obesity risk, few studies have examined the relationship between BLW and infant growth robustly. BLW does not seem to increase the risk of inadequate zinc or iron intake; however, emphasis needs to be given to ensuring adequate intake of these micronutrients among all infants. A better understanding of the impacts of BLW is needed to inform evidence-based recommendations to support and guide parents in complementary feeding methods.

Keywords: baby-led weaning; complementary feeding; infant feeding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Data extraction process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Schwartz C., Scholtens P.A., Lalanne A., Weenen H., Nicklaus S. Development of healthy eating habits early in life. Review of recent evidence and selected guidelines. Appetite. 2011;57:796–807. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.05.316. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenkranz R.R., Dzewaltowski D. Model of the home food environment pertaining to childhood obesity. Nutr. Rev. 2008;66:123–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00017.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brofenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am. Psychol. 1977;32:513–531. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513. - DOI
    1. Davison K., Birch L.L. Childhood overweight: A contextual model and recommendations for future research. Obes. Rev. 2001;2:159–171. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-789x.2001.00036.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Story M., Kaphingst K.M., Robinson-O’Brien R., Glanz K. Creating Healthy Food and Eating Environments: Policy and Environmental Approaches. Annu. Rev. Public Health. 2008;29:253–272. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926. - DOI - PubMed