Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 5;22(13):7222.
doi: 10.3390/ijms22137222.

Less Carcinogenic Chlorinated Estrogens Applicable to Hormone Replacement Therapy

Affiliations

Less Carcinogenic Chlorinated Estrogens Applicable to Hormone Replacement Therapy

Yoshinori Okamoto et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Human estrogens prescribed for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are known to be potent carcinogens. To find safer estrogens, several chlorinated estrogens were synthesized and their carcinogenic potential were determined. A pellet containing either 2-chloro-17β-estradiol (2-ClE2) or 4-chloro-17β-estradiol (4-ClE2) was implanted subcutaneously for 52 weeks into August Copenhagen Irish (ACI) rats, a preferred animal model for human breast cancer. 17β-Estradiol (E2) frequently induced mammary tumors while both 2-ClE2 and 4-ClE2 did not. Their 17α-ethinyl forms, thought to be orally active estrogens, were also synthesized. Neither 2-chloro-17α-ethinylestradiol (2-ClEE2) nor 4-chloro-17α-ethinylestradiol (4-ClEE2) induced tumors. The less carcinogenic effects were supported by histological examination of mammary glands of ACI rats treated with the chlorinated estrogens. A chlorine atom positioned at the 2- or 4-position of E2 may prevent the metabolic activation, resulting in reducing the carcinogenicity. 2-ClE2 and 4-ClE2 administered subcutaneously and 2-ClEE2 and 4-ClEE2 given orally to ovariectomized rats all showed uterotrophic potency, albeit slightly weaker than that of E2. Our results indicate that less carcinogenic chlorinated estrogens retaining estrogenic potential could be safer alternatives to the carcinogenic estrogens now in use for HRT.

Keywords: DNA damage; chlorination; estrogen; hormone replacement therapy; mammary tumor; uterotrophic activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed oxidative mechanism of chlorinated estrogens.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structures of E2 and EE2 and their chlorinated compounds.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative incidence of mammary tumors in chlorinated estrogen-treated rats. Development of mammary tumors in ACI rats implanted with placebo (n = 5), E2 [1.25 mg (n = 5), 2.5 mg (n = 10)], 2-ClE2 [5.0 mg (n = 6)], or 4-ClE2 [5.0 mg (n = 6)] pellets was monitored once a week for 52 weeks.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Morphological examination of mammary glands of chlorinated estrogen-treated rats. Mammary glands were collected from ACI rats at the end of the experiments. Mammary tissue of ACI rats implanted with placebo (A), E2 (2.5 mg) (B), 2-ClE2 (5.0 mg) (C), 4-ClE2 (5.0 mg) (D), 2-ClEE2 (5.0 mg) (E), or 4-ClEE2 (5.0 mg) (F) and stained with hematoxylin (magnification 10×).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Uterotrophic potential of chlorinated estrogens on OVX-rats. (A) OVX-rats (4 rats/group) were treated subcutaneously for 3 days with 2-ClE2 (3.4 or 34 μg/rat/day) or 4-ClE2 (3.4 or 34 μg/rat/day). The rats treated with E2 (3.0 μg/rat/day) were used as positive controls. The negative control rats received vehicle only. (B) OVX-rats (4 rats/group) were treated orally for 3 days with 2-ClEE2 (18 or 54 μg/rat/day) or 4-ClE2 (18 or 54 μg/rat/day). The rats treated with EE2 (16.5 μg/rat/day) were used as positive controls. On day 4, uterine wet-weight/bw ratios were calculated and compared to that obtained for OVX-rats that received vehicle, as described in Materials and Methods. Statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test) was performed for multiple comparisons to evaluate differences; *, p < 0.05 (control vs. 2-ClEE2 (54 μg/rat)); ****, p < 0.0001 (control vs. E2 (3.0 μg/rat), 2-ClE2 (34 μg/rat), 4-ClE2 (34 μg/rat), EE2 (16.5 μg/rat), or 4-ClE2 (54 μg/rat)).

Similar articles

References

    1. Grodstein F., Stampfer M.J., Colditz G.A., Willett W.C., Manson J.E., Joffe M., Rosner B., Fuchs C., Hankinson S.E., Hunter D.L., et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and mortality. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997;336:1769–1775. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199706193362501. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolton J.L., Pisha E., Zhang F., Qiu S. Role of quinoids in estrogen carcinogenesis. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1998;11:1113–1127. doi: 10.1021/tx9801007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colditz G.A., Hankinson S.E., Hunter D.J., Willett W.C., Manson J.E., Stampfer M.J., Hennekens C.H., Rosner B., Speizer F.E. The use of estrogens and progestins and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;332:1589–1593. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199506153322401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen C.L., Weiss N.S., Newcomb P., Barlow W., White E. Hormone replacement therapy in relation to breast cancer. JAMA. 2002;287:734–741. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.6.734. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lacey J.V., Jr., Mink P.J., Lubin J.H., Sherman M.E., Troisi R., Hartge P., Schatzkin A., Schairer C. Menopausal hormone replacement therapy and risk of ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2002;288:334–341. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.334. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources