Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 19;6(1):63.
doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00224-6.

Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels

Affiliations

Incidental findings from cancer next generation sequencing panels

Nika Maani et al. NPJ Genom Med. .

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have facilitated multi-gene panel (MGP) testing to detect germline DNA variants in hereditary cancer patients. This sensitive technique can uncover unexpected, non-germline incidental findings indicative of mosaicism, clonal hematopoiesis (CH), or hematologic malignancies. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify cases of incidental findings from NGS-MGP testing. Inclusion criteria included: 1) multiple pathogenic variants in the same patient; 2) pathogenic variants at a low allele fraction; and/or 3) the presence of pathogenic variants not consistent with family history. Secondary tissue analysis, complete blood count (CBC) and medical record review were conducted to further delineate the etiology of the pathogenic variants. Of 6060 NGS-MGP tests, 24 cases fulfilling our inclusion criteria were identified. Pathogenic variants were detected in TP53, ATM, CHEK2, BRCA1 and APC. 18/24 (75.0%) patients were classified as CH, 3/24 (12.5%) as mosaic, 2/24 (8.3%) related to a hematologic malignancy, and 1/24 (4.2%) as true germline. We describe a case-specific workflow to identify and interpret the nature of incidental findings on NGS-MGP. This workflow will provide oncology and genetic clinics a practical guide for the management and counselling of patients with unexpected NGS-MGP findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Genetic findings.
Recommended diagnostic algorithm for patients presenting with potential incidental findings identified through NGS-MGP testing on peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL)-derived DNA. Genetic findings in individuals undergoing germline NGS-MGP testing on PBLs are classified in one of three categories and subsequently undergo further testing to identify downstream surveillance and diagnosis. This includes secondary tissue analysis (culture skin biopsy preferred) and medical chart review. CBC complete blood count.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Meldrum C, Doyle MA, Tothill RW. Next-generation sequencing for cancer diagnostics: a practical perspective. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2011;32:177–195. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guidugli L, et al. Clinical utility of gene panel-based testing for hereditary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute leukemia predisposition syndromes. Leukemia. 2017;31:1226–1229. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.28. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coffee B, et al. Detection of somatic variants in peripheral blood lymphocytes using a next generation sequencing multigene pan cancer panel. Cancer Genet. 2017;211:5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2017.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nagahashi M, et al. Next generation sequencing‐based gene panel tests for the management of solid tumors. Cancer Sci. 2019;110:6–15. doi: 10.1111/cas.13837. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coombs CC, et al. Identification of clonal hematopoiesis mutations in solid tumor patients undergoing unpaired next-generation sequencing assays. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;24:5918–5924. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1201. - DOI - PMC - PubMed