Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;6(8):1031-1042.
doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00937-5. Epub 2021 Jul 19.

MX2-mediated innate immunity against HIV-1 is regulated by serine phosphorylation

Affiliations

MX2-mediated innate immunity against HIV-1 is regulated by serine phosphorylation

Gilberto Betancor et al. Nat Microbiol. 2021 Aug.

Erratum in

Abstract

The antiviral cytokine interferon activates expression of interferon-stimulated genes to establish an antiviral state. Myxovirus resistance 2 (MX2, also known as MxB) is an interferon-stimulated gene that inhibits the nuclear import of HIV-1 and interacts with the viral capsid and cellular nuclear transport machinery. Here, we identified the myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP) subunits myosin phosphatase target subunit 1 (MYPT1) and protein phosphatase 1 catalytic subunit-β (PPP1CB) as positively-acting regulators of MX2, interacting with its amino-terminal domain. We demonstrated that serine phosphorylation of the N-terminal domain at positions 14, 17 and 18 suppresses MX2 antiviral function, prevents interactions with the HIV-1 capsid and nuclear transport factors, and is reversed by MLCP. Notably, serine phosphorylation of the N-terminal domain also impedes MX2-mediated inhibition of nuclear import of cellular karyophilic cargo. We also found that interferon treatment reduces levels of phosphorylation at these serine residues and outline a homeostatic regulatory mechanism in which repression of MX2 by phosphorylation, together with MLCP-mediated dephosphorylation, balances the deleterious effects of MX2 on normal cell function with innate immunity against HIV-1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 2
Extended Data Fig. 2
Extended Data Fig. 3
Extended Data Fig. 3
Extended Data Fig. 4
Extended Data Fig. 4
Extended Data Fig. 5
Extended Data Fig. 5
Extended Data Fig. 6
Extended Data Fig. 6
Fig. 1
Fig. 1. The N-terminal domain of MX2 interacts with MYPT1 and PPP1CB
a, Stable isotope labelling by amino acids (SILAC) screen for MX2 binding proteins. Streptavidin-tagged MX2, MX1, MX2 R11-13A, GFP or GFP (NTDMX2) were expressed in 293T cells labelled with “light”, “medium” or “heavy” amino acids, immune-affinity purified and analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry. Representative experiments comparing MX2 (medium) versus MX1 (light) (n= 3 biological replicates), MX2 (medium) versus mock (light) transfected cells (n= 1), GFP (NTDMX2) (heavy) versus GFP (light) (n= 2 biological replicates) and MX2 (light) versus MX2 R11-13A (medium) (n= 3 biological replicates) are shown. Values on the y-axis are in Log-2 scale. b, MX2 domain organization showing the sequence of the N-terminal 25 amino acids, highlighting the MLCP binding motif (in red) and a consensus PP1 binding sequence (in green). c, Interaction of endogenous PPP1CB (upper panel) or MYPT1 (lower panel) with the MX2 N-terminal domain. Transfected 293T cells expressing Flag-tagged MX1, MX2, MX2 R11-13A, GFP (NTDMX2) or GFP (NTDMX2) R11-13A were lysed, proteins immunoprecipitated (IP) with an anti-Flag antibody and analyzed by immunoblot using anti-PPP1CB, anti-MYPT1 or anti-Flag antibodies. All experiments were done at least 4 times.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. MX2 requires functional MLCP for antiviral activity
a, U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells were transduced with pEasiLV vectors expressing MX2 or the negative control protein Luc and protein expression induced by doxycycline (0.5 μg/ml) for 48 h. MYPT1 or PPP1CB were then depleted by double siRNA transfection. Cells were challenged with wild type or P90A versions of HIV-1/GFP or MLV/GFP and the percentage of infected cells from the pEasiLV transduced population (typically >85%), enumerated at 48 h by flow cytometry (n = 7 biological replicates for HIV-1; n = 6 biological replicates for P90A and MLV, mean ± standard deviation (SD) *p value <0.05; two-tailed unpaired t-test). b, Immunoblot analysis of MYPT1 and PPP1CB depletion in U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells from panel A. Tubulin is included as a loading control. c, U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells expressing MX2 or Luc were treated with increasing concentrations of calyculin A, okadaic acid or rubratoxin A (or DMSO as a control) 6 h before challenge with HIV-1/GFP. Inhibitors were removed 24 h after addition and the percentage of infected cells enumerated at 48 h by flow cytometry (n = 7 biological replicates for calyculin A; n = 5 biological replicates for okadaic acid and rubratoxin A, mean ± SD, *p value <0.05, (ns) non-significant; two-tailed unpaired t-test).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Interferon-induced MX2-mediated inhibition of HIV-1 requires MLCP
a, U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells transduced with a control guide RNA, as well as a bulk population and two clonal cell lines where MX2 had been disrupted by CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, were either transfected twice with a control siRNA (CTR), or siRNAs targeting MX2, MYPT1 or PPP1CB, and treated or not with 500 U/ml IFNα for 24 h. Alternatively, cells were treated with 3 nM calyculin A (or DMSO) 6 h before infection and medium exchange 18 h later. Cells were challenged with HIV-1/GFP and infection enumerated at 48 h by flow cytometry (n = 10 biological replicates for CTR CRISPR cells siRNA treatment and n = 8 biological replicates for calyculin A treatment; n = 5 biological replicates for MX2 CRISPR Bulk cells; n = 7 biological replicates for MX2 CRISPR_1 cells; n = 5 biological replicates for MX2 CRISPR_2 cells, mean ± SD, *p value <0.05; two-tailed unpaired t-test). b, Immunoblot analysis of MX2, MYPT1, PPP1CB and tubulin (loading control) in CTR CRISPR, MX2 CRISPR Bulk, MX2 CRISPR_1 and MX2 CRISPR_2 cells (from panel A). c, Primary CD4+ T cells were isolated from 4 donors, transduced with shRNAs targeting MX2, MYPT1, PPP1CB or a scrambled sequence shRNA (CTR) and treated or not with 2,000 U/ml IFNα. At 24 h, cells were challenged with NL4.3/Nef-IRES-Renilla and luciferase activity determined 48 h later. Raw infectivity data are shown on the left (mean values from 3 technical replicates), and the fold inhibition of infection (no IFN/IFN) normalized to the CTR shRNA (arbitrary value of 100), on the right (*p-value <0.05; two-tailed paired t-test). d, MX2, MYPT1 or PPP1CB depletion in primary CD4+ T cells after shRNA transduction was quantitated by qPCR, normalizing to GAPDH. Data shown represent the donors used in panel C (n = 4, mean ± SD). e, Primary CD4+ T cells treated or not with 2,000 U/ml of IFNα were incubated in the presence of DMSO or two concentrations of calyculin A (1 nm or 3 nM). After 6 h, cells were challenged with NL4.3/Nef-IRES-Renilla and luciferase activity determined after 48 h. Raw infectivity data from all 7 donors are shown on the left and the fold inhibition of infection (no IFN/IFN), on the right (*p-value <0.05; two-tailed paired t-test).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. MX2 antiviral activity is antagonized by phosphorylation
a, MX2 domain organization showing the sequence of the N-terminal domain, and indicating phosphorylated residues (in red). b, U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells were transduced with pEasiLV expressing Flag-tagged wild type or mutant MX2, or the Luc control. After induction with 0.5 μg/ml of doxycycline for 48 h, cells were challenged with HIV-1/GFP and infectivity measured 48 h later (n = 5 biological replicates, mean ± SD). The anti-Flag immunoblot shows MX2 expression levels, with tubulin as the loading control. c, Specificity of the anti-phosphorylated S14, 17-18 NTD antibody (anti-P-NTD) defined using cell lysates containing wild type or mutated MX2 proteins. Total protein expression (anti-Flag) is shown with tubulin serving as a loading control (representative from 3 independent experiments). d, MX2 or MX2 S14, 17-18D expressing U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells were doubly transfected with an siRNA targeting PPP1CB or CTR siRNA. Cells were lysed at 48 h and the levels of MX2 phosphorylated at the S14-S17-S18 motif (anti-P-NTD), total MX2 (anti-Flag) or PPP1CB determined by immunoblot. Tubulin was used as a loading control. Quantification of phosphorylation, relative to the MX2 long isoform and normalized to CTR siRNA, is to the right (n = 3 biological replicates, mean ± SD, *p value <0.05; two-tailed unpaired t-test). e, DMSO (0) or increasing concentrations of calyculin A were added to U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells expressing MX2 or MX2 S14, 17-18D. 6 h after treatment, cells were lysed and MX2 (anti-Flag), MX2 phosphorylated at the S14-S17-S18 motif (anti-P-NTD) or PPP1CB analysed by immunoblot. Tubulin was used as a loading control. Quantification of the level of phosphorylation, relative to the MX2 long isoform and normalized to the DMSO control, is to the right (n = 3 biological replicates, mean ± SD, *p value <0.05; two-tailed unpaired t-test). f, U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells expressing Luc, MX2 or MX2 S14, 17-18A were transfected with a CTR siRNA or a siRNA targeting PPP1CB before HIV-1/GFP challenge, infectivity was measured 48 h later by flow cytometry (n = 6 biological replicates, mean ± SD). The fold inhibition by MX2, relative to Luc, is shown. Fold inhibition for MX2 is significantly lower following PPP1CB siRNA treatment ed cells compared to CTR (x12.5 vs x5.7; P value = 0.0001; two-tailed unpaired t-test), but not for MX2 S14, 17-18A (x11.4 vs x10.5; P value = 0.4754; two-tailed unpaired t-test). Protein expression was confirmed by immunoblot (right panel).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Phosphorylation of MX2 reduces HIV-1 capsid binding and nuclear envelope accumulation
a, 293T cells were transfected with pCAGGs vectors expressing Flag-tagged MX1, MX2, mutant MX2 S14, 17-18D, GFP, GFP (NTDMX2) or GFP (NTDMX2) S14, 17-18D. Cell lysates were incubated in the presence or absence of Capsid-Nucleocapsid (CANC) assemblies and subjected to centrifugation through a sucrose cushion. Supernatant (Sup), Pellet and Input samples were analyzed by immunoblot using an anti-Flag antibody. A representative immunoblot for CANC (anti-CA) is shown. All experiments were done at least 4 times. b, 293T cells expressing GFP (NTDMX2) were transfected twice with a CTR siRNA or siRNA targeting PPP1CB, lysed and incubated with CANC assemblies. This mixture was centrifuged and Sup, Pellet and Input samples were analyzed by immunoblot using an anti-Flag antibody. A representative immunoblot for CANC (anti-CA) is shown. PPP1CB depletion was confirmed by immunoblot using an anti-PPP1CB antibody. All experiments were done at least 3 times. c, HeLa cells stably expressing wild type or S14, 17-18D mutant MX2 bearing a C-terminal Flag-tag were seeded onto glass coverslips. Localization of MX2 and endogenous NUP358 were determined by confocal microscopy using anti-Flag and anti-NUP358 antibodies. DAPI was used to stain the nuclei. Below, colocalization of MX2 and NUP358 was quantified using Mander’s coefficient for an average of 95 cells per condition, randomly selected (*p-value <0.05; two-tailed unpaired t-test)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. MX2-phosphorylation and nuclear import of cellular cargo
a, HeLa cells stably expressing the HNRNP K (KNS)-GFP-LacZ chimera were transduced with puromycinR vectors expressing Flag-tagged MX1, MX2 or MX2 S14, 17-18D and selected for 48 h with puromycin before seeding on glass coverslips. MX proteins were detected using an anti-Flag antibody and the nuclei were stained with DAPI. b, Nuclear localization of KNS-GFP-LacZ was determined for single cells by quantifying colocalization with DAPI using Mander’s coefficient for an average of 104 randomly selected cells (*p-value <0.05; two-tailed unpaired t-test). c, 293T cells were co-transfected with vectors expressing HA-tagged MX1, MX2 or S14, 17-18D MX2 and Flag-tagged TNPO1 or a C-terminal fragment of NUP214. Cells were lysed and HA-tagged proteins immunoprecipitated and analyzed (together with input samples) by immunoblot using anti-Flag and anti-HA antibodies. All experiments were performed at least 3 times. d, U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells stably expressing Flag-tagged MX2 were treated or not with 1000 U/ml IFNα for 24 h before lysis and immunoblot analysis with anti-P-NTD or anti-Flag antibodies. Tubulin was used as a loading control. The level of MX2 phosphorylated at the S14-S17-S18 motif, relative to the MX2 long isoform, and normalized to the untreated condition was determined (n =5 biological replicates, mean ± SD, *p-value <0.05; two-tailed unpaired t-test). e, RFP bearing the NTD of MX2 (RFP(NTDMX2)) was expressed in U87-MG CD4+ CXCR4+ cells. Cells were incubated or not with 1000 U/ml IFNα for 24 h, lysed and the level of phosphorylation at the S14-S17-S18 motif, relative to the RFP (NTDMX2) long isoform and normalized to the untreated condition, determined as in panel d (n =3 biological replicates, mean ± SD, *p-value <0.05; two-tailed unpaired t-test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Doyle T, Goujon C, Malim MH. HIV-1 and interferons: who’s interfering with whom? Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2015;13:403–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourke NM, et al. Control of HIV infection by IFN-α: implications for latency and a cure. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2018;75:775–783. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goujon C, et al. Human MX2 is an interferon-induced post-entry inhibitor of HIV-1 infection. Nature. 2013;502:559–562. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kane M, et al. MX2 is an interferon-induced inhibitor of HIV-1 infection. Nature. 2013;502:563–566. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu Z, et al. The interferon-inducible MxB protein inhibits HIV-1 infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;14:398–410. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms