Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;84(12):848016.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe848016. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

Expert Consensus to Finalize a Universal Evaluator Rubric to Assess Pharmacy Students' Patient Communication Skills

Susanne G Barnett  1 , Andrea L Porter  2   3 , Sheila M Allen  4 , Karen M S Bastianelli  5 , Jennifer S Chen  5 , Marlowe Djuric Kachlic  4 , Casey E Gallimore  2 , Kristen L Goliak  4 , Jeffrey C Reist  6
Affiliations

Expert Consensus to Finalize a Universal Evaluator Rubric to Assess Pharmacy Students' Patient Communication Skills

Susanne G Barnett et al. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objective. To use an expert consensus-building process to develop a rubric used by multiple evaluator types to assess Doctor of Pharmacy students' patient communication skills.Methods. Faculty and staff members from six schools and colleges of pharmacy collaborated on a multi-step expert consensus-building process to create the final version of a communication rubric. First, faculty and patient content experts evaluated each item in the rubric for its relevance, criticality, and global comprehensiveness using a five-point Likert scale (0=not at all, 4=to a high extent). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the resulting data. Faculty members evaluated the results and came to a consensus on the second version of the rubric. A corresponding codebook was developed and refined through a two-phase process.Results. The initial communication rubric was evaluated by 13 expert reviewers. Mean global comprehensiveness on the rubric was 3.83 for faculty experts and 3.5 for patient experts. After evaluating results from the expert consensus-building process, 14 items on the rubric did not change, five items were revised, three items were removed, and two items were added. The second version of the instrument included 20 items in six topic areas. A codebook was finalized to increase scoring consistency for the 20 communication items.Conclusion. Overall, content experts concluded that the rubric had high global comprehensiveness. Collaboration involving faculty members from multiple schools of pharmacy resulted in a 20-item communication rubric and codebook that can be used to increase consistency in scoring student pharmacists' patient communication skills.

Keywords: assessment tool; communication rubric; consensus building; medication education; patient education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Expert consensus building process used to evaluate a universal evaluator rubric to assess pharmacy students’ communication skills. Key: BTAA-PBAC: Big Ten Academic Alliance – Performance-Based Assessment Committee, UW: University of Wisconsin – Madison, IA: University of Iowa, UIC: University of Illinois at Chicago, MN: University of Minnesota, RU: Rutgers University, OSU: The Ohio State University
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. De Young M. Research on the effects of pharmacist–patient communication in institutions and ambulatory care sites, 1969-1994. Am J Health Syst Pharm . 1996;53:1277-1291. - PubMed
    1. Davis NM, Cohen MR. Counseling reduces dispensing accidents. Am Pharm . 1992;NS32:22. - PubMed
    1. Kimberlin CL. Communicating with patients: skills assessment in US Colleges of Pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(3):67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallman A, Vaudan C, Sporrong S. Communications training in pharmacy education, 1995-2010. Am J Pharm Educ . 2013;77(2):Article 36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grice G, Gattas N, Sailors J, et al. . Health literacy: use of the Four Habits Model to improve student pharmacists’ communication. Patient Education and Counseling. 2013;90:23-28. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources