Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Jul 20;11(7):e045087.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045087.

Sedation strategy and ICU delirium: a multicentre, population-based propensity score-matched cohort study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Sedation strategy and ICU delirium: a multicentre, population-based propensity score-matched cohort study

Colin Casault et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: We examined the relationship between dominant sedation strategy, risk of delirium and patient-centred outcomes in adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs).

Design: Retrospective propensity-matched cohort study.

Setting: Mechanically ventilated adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to four Canadian hospital medical/surgical ICUs from 2014 to 2016 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Participants: 2837 mechanically ventilated adults (≥ 18 years) requiring admission to a medical/surgical ICU were evaluated for the relationship between sedation strategy and delirium.

Interventions: None.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary exposure was dominant sedation strategy, defined as the sedative infusion, including midazolam, propofol or fentanyl, with the longest duration before the first delirium assessment. The primary outcome was 'ever delirium' identified using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), ventilation duration and days with delirium. The cohort was analysed in two propensity score (patient characteristics and therapies received) matched cohorts (propofol vs fentanyl and propofol vs midazolam).

Results: 2837 patients (60.7% male; median age 57 years (IQR 43-68)) were considered for propensity matching. In propensity score-matched cohorts(propofol vs midazolam, n=712; propofol vs fentanyl, n=1732), the odds of delirium were significantly higher with midazolam (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.00)) and fentanyl (OR 1.22 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.48)) compared with propofol dominant sedation strategies. Dominant sedation strategy with midazolam and fentanyl were associated with a longer duration of ventilation compared with propofol. Fentanyl was also associated with increased ICU mortality (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.12)) ICU and hospital LOS compared with a propofol dominant sedation strategy.

Conclusions: We identified a novel association between fentanyl dominant sedation strategies and an increased risk of delirium, a composite outcome of delirium or death, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and hospital LOS. Midazolam dominant sedation strategies were associated with increased delirium risk and mechanical ventilation duration.

Keywords: adult intensive & critical care; delirium & cognitive disorders; health & safety; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort diagram. DAD, discharge abstract database; ICDSC, Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist; ICU, intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Propensity score-matched ORs of delirium by dominant sedation strategy prior to first ICDSC assessment. ICDSC, Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of propensity score-matched mean or rate ratios of secondary outcomes and sedation strategy. ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Association AP . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM-5. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
    1. Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, et al. . Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA 2001;286:2703–10. 10.1001/jama.286.21.2703 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dubois MJ, Bergeron N, Dumont M, et al. . Delirium in an intensive care unit: a study of risk factors. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:1297–304. 10.1007/s001340101017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pandharipande P, Cotton BA, Shintani A, et al. . Prevalence and risk factors for development of delirium in surgical and trauma intensive care unit patients. J Trauma 2008;65:34–41. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31814b2c4d - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD, et al. . Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (awakening and breathing controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008;371:126–34. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60105-1 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances