Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 18;13(6):e15748.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.15748. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Effect of Payer Status on the Survival of Colon Cancer Patients

Affiliations

Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Effect of Payer Status on the Survival of Colon Cancer Patients

Lawrence Shi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background and objective Colon cancer is one of the most common types of cancer globally. The factors that could affect colon cancer survival include age, stage, treatment, and other socioeconomic aspects. Payer status has been shown to be a significant predictor of cancer patient survival in retrospective studies. However, due to the limitations of retrospective studies, patient baseline characteristics between payer statuses are not comparable. Few studies have addressed the effect of payer status on the overall survival (OS) of patients using propensity score matching (PSM). In light of this, we conducted a study to examine the effect of payer status on the survival of colon cancer patients based on PSM. Materials and methods About 66,493 stage II/III colon cancer patients aged 40-90 years and diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were analyzed from a de-identified National Cancer Database (NCDB) file. All patients had undergone surgery, and patients who had received radiation therapy, hormone therapy, immunotherapy, palliative care, or therapies other than chemotherapy were excluded. Only private or Medicaid payer status was included. The propensity score was calculated by computing the probability of patients being in the Medicaid group using logistic regression. The PSMATCH procedure in the SAS software (SAS Inc., Gary, NC) was used to perform PSM on patients with Medicaid and private insurance. The greedy nearest neighbor matching method was used to match one Medicaid to one privately insured patient with a caliper of 0.2. At the same time, an exact match was done for gender, age group, race, and stage at diagnosis. Multivariate Cox regression was then used to estimate the effect of payer status on survival before and after PSM. Results Among the 66,493 patients, 90.3% were privately insured and 9.7% had Medicaid. In univariate analysis, payer status was found to be a significant predictor of OS. Prior to PSM, the median overall survival (MOS) for patients with private insurance was 12.75 years, while those with Medicaid had a MOS of 9.02 years. After PSM, 6,167 paired patients were matched, and patients with private insurance had a MOS of >12.82 years and Medicaid patients had a MOS of 8.88 years. After PSM, patients with Medicaid had a 50% increased risk of death, and payer status proved to be a statistically significant predictor of OS of colon cancer. Conclusion Based on our findings, as per the PSM method, payer status can be a significant predictor of survival among colon cancer patients. Also, chemotherapy, race, age, and other socioeconomic factors were also found to be significant predictors of OS. Further research should be conducted to investigate other covariates not studied here and the mediation effect of payer on the survival of cancer patients.

Keywords: colon cancer; healthcare insurance; payer status; propensity score matching (psm); retrospective study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overall survival according to payer status prior to propensity score matching
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall survival according to payer status after propensity score matching

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes. Ward E, Halpern M, Schrag N, et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:9–31. - PubMed
    1. Contribution of income-related inequality and healthcare utilisation to survival in cancers of the lung, liver, stomach and colon. Yim J, Hwang SS, Yoo KY, Kim CY. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66:37–40. - PubMed
    1. The effect of health insurance status on the treatment and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer. Parikh AA, Robinson J, Zaydfudim VM, Penson D, Whiteside MA. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:227–232. - PubMed
    1. Effects of type of health insurance coverage on colorectal cancer survival in Puerto Rico: a population-based study. Ortiz-Ortiz KJ, Ramírez-García R, Cruz-Correa M, Ríos-González MY, Ortiz AP. PLoS One. 2014;9:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes. Roetzheim RG, Pal N, Gonzalez EC, Ferrante JM, Van Durme DJ, Krischer JP. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1746–1754. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources