Prostatic Artery Embolization Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Post Hoc Cost Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- PMID: 34286370
- PMCID: PMC8549945
- DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-02920-3
Prostatic Artery Embolization Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Post Hoc Cost Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Abstract
Purpose: To perform a post hoc analysis of patient-incurred costs in a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing prostatic artery embolization (PAE) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
Materials and methods: Patients older than 60 years with indication of TURP were randomized to PAE or TURP procedure. After intervention and hospital discharge, patients were follow-up during 12 months The associated patient costs were categorized according to the study period: pre-intervention, intervention, hospitalization, and follow-up. Several items for both groups were analyzed within each study period.
Results: The mean total costs per patient were lower for PAE (€ 3,192.87) than for TURP (€ 3,974.57), with this difference of € 781.70 being significant (p = 0.026). For most evaluated items, the mean costs were significantly higher for TURP. No significant differences were observed in the mean costs of PAE (€ 1,468.00) and TURP (€ 1,684.25) procedures (p = 0.061). However, the histopathology analysis, recovery room stay, and intraoperative laboratory analysis increased the interventional costs for TURP (€ 1,999.70) compared with PAE (€ 1,468.00) (p < 0.001). No cost differences were observed between PAE (€ 725.26) and TURP (€ 556.22) during the 12 months of follow-up (p = 0.605). None of patients required a repeat intervention during the study period.
Conclusions: Considering the short-term follow-up, PAE was associated with significantly lower costs compared with TURP. Future investigations in the context of routine clinical practice should be aimed at comparing the long-term effectiveness of both procedures and determining their cost-effectiveness.
Level of evidence: Level 1 (a-c).
Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Costs; Prostatic artery embolization (PAE); Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Comment in
-
Invited Commentary: Prostatic Artery Embolization Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A Post Hoc Cost Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, By Capdevila et al.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Nov;44(11):1778-1779. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02972-5. Epub 2021 Sep 24. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021. PMID: 34561741 No abstract available.
References
-
- McVary KT. BPH: epidemiology and comorbidities. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(5 Suppl):S122–S128. - PubMed
-
- Gravas S, Cornu JN DM et al. EAU guidelines: management of non-neurogenic male LUTS [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/
-
- Insausti I, Sáez de Ocáriz A, Galbete A, Capdevila F, Solchaga S, Giral P, et al. Randomized comparison of prostatic artery embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Vasc Interv Radiol [Internet]. 2020 Apr;1–9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1051044320301561 - PubMed
-
- Abt D, Hechelhammer L, Müllhaupt G, Markart S, Güsewell S, Kessler TM. Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2018 doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2338. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Patel NR, Elterman DS, Thulasidasan N, Altman R, Tai E, Zener R. Initial Canadian experience of prostate artery embolization for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: midterm outcomes. Can Assoc Radiol J = J l’Association Can des Radiol Can Assoc Radiol. 2020 doi: 10.1177/0846537120939930. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials