Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;27(8):2081-2089.
doi: 10.3201/eid2708.210667.

Effects of Patient Characteristics on Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Samples for SARS-CoV-2 Testing

Collaborators

Effects of Patient Characteristics on Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Samples for SARS-CoV-2 Testing

Sarah E Smith-Jeffcoat et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021.

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of self-collected anterior nasal swab (ANS) and saliva samples compared with healthcare worker-collected nasopharyngeal swab specimens used to test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We used the same PCR diagnostic panel to test all self-collected and healthcare worker-collected samples from participants at a public hospital in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Among 1,076 participants, 51.9% were men, 57.1% were >50 years of age, 81.2% were Black (non-Hispanic), and 74.9% reported >1 chronic medical condition. In total, 8.0% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Compared with nasopharyngeal swab samples, ANS samples had a sensitivity of 59% and saliva samples a sensitivity of 68%. Among participants tested 3-7 days after symptom onset, ANS samples had a sensitivity of 80% and saliva samples a sensitivity of 85%. Sensitivity varied by specimen type and patient characteristics. These findings can help physicians interpret PCR results for SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: 2019 novel coronavirus disease; COVID-19; Georgia; SARS-CoV-2; United States; anterior nasal; coronavirus disease; coronaviruses; respiratory infections; saliva; self-collected; sensitivity; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; viruses; zoonoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient enrollment and sample results for investigation of the effects of patient characteristics on self-collected and healthcare worker–collected samples for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. ANS, anterior nasal swab; NPS, nasopharyngeal swab; QC, quality control.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ct values of self-collected and healthcare worker–collected samples for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. PCR completed using CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Diagnostic Panel (15). A) ANS and NPS samples at PCR target N1. B) ANS and NPS samples at PCR target N2. C) NPS and saliva samples at PCR target N1. D) NPS and saliva samples at PCR target N2. ANS, anterior nasal swab; Ct, cycle threshold; NPS, nasopharyngeal swab.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ct values of self-collected and healthcare worker–collected samples for N1 target of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 PCR, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. PCR completed using CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Diagnostic Panel (15). Horizontal lines within boxes indicate medians; box tops and bottoms indicate 25th and 75th percentiles; whiskers indicate the range. ANS, anterior nasal swab; Ct, cycle threshold; NPS, nasopharyngeal swab.

References

    1. World Health Organization. COVID-19 weekly epidemiological update—27 January 2021. 2021 Jan 27 [cited 2021 Feb 9]. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update---...
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim guidelines for collecting, handling, and testing clinical specimens for COVID-19. 2021. [cited 2021 Jan 29]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-specim...
    1. Tu Y-P, Jennings R, Hart B, Cangelosi GA, Wood RC, Wehber K, et al. Swabs collected by patients or health care workers for SARS-CoV-2 testing. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:494–6. 10.1056/NEJMc2016321 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCormick-Baw C, Morgan K, Gaffney D, Cazares Y, Jaworski K, Byrd A, et al. Saliva as an alternate specimen source for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic patients using Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58:e01109–20. 10.1128/JCM.01109-20 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Procop GW, Shrestha NK, Vogel S, Van Sickle K, Harrington S, Rhoads DD, et al. A direct comparison of enhanced saliva to nasopharyngeal swab for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58:e01946–20. 10.1128/JCM.01946-20 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types