Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;28(10):5752-5757.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10493-1. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

Full Abstract to Published Manuscript: Evaluation of the Scientific Impact of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Conference

Affiliations

Full Abstract to Published Manuscript: Evaluation of the Scientific Impact of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Conference

Zachary J Brown et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The scientific rigor of the abstracts presented at the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) annual meeting has not been recently evaluated. In this study, we sought to determine the rate at which abstracts presented at the 2017 and 2018 ASBrS meetings were published in peer-reviewed journals, and compared the rates with breast abstracts presented at the 2018 Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) meeting.

Methods: Abstracts from the 2017 and 2018 ASBrS and 2018 SSO conferences were searched in PubMed for published manuscripts using the abstract title and/or first or last author.

Results: In 2017, 21.6% of the 268 abstracts presented at the ASBrS conference resulted in full publication, compared with 36.6% of the 273 abstracts presented at the 2018 ASBrS conference, resulting in a significant difference in the publication rate (p < 0.001). Of the 158 abstracts published from the 2017 and 2018 meetings, 75 (47.8%) were published in Annals of Surgical Oncology (ASO). There was no correlation between impact factor and time to publication. Oral presentations and quick shots were more likely to be published than poster presentations, and oral presentations were more likely to be published in higher-impact journals. The 2018 SSO meetings resulted in 54 of 111 (48.6%) breast abstracts leading to full publication.

Conclusion: Approximately 29.2% of the abstracts presented at the ASBrS 2017 and 2018 conferences resulted in a published manuscript. A higher publication rate in higher impact journals for oral presentations indicates that the abstract review process properly stratifies the research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Zachary J. Brown, Amy Li, Chengli Shen, and Ko Un Park declare they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Association of impact factor and time to publication (r = − 0.0856, p = 0.220). ASBrS American Society of Breast Surgeons, SSO Society of Surgical Oncology

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ioannidis JP. Are medical conferences useful? And for whom? JAMA. 2012;307(12):1257–1258. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.360. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murrey DB, Wright RW, Seiler JG, 3rd, Day TE, Schwartz HS. Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 1993 annual Academy meeting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;359:247–253. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199902000-00028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross JS, Gross CP, Desai MM, et al. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA. 2006;295(14):1675–1680. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1675. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toma M, McAlister FA, Bialy L, Adams D, Vandermeer B, Armstrong PW. Transition from meeting abstract to full-length journal article for randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2006;295(11):1281–1287. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1281. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weintraub WH. Are published manuscripts representative of the surgical meeting abstracts? An objective appraisal. J Pediatr Surg. 1987;22(1):11–13. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3468(87)80005-2. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources