Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;99(4):864-881.
doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12521. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

Beyond Causality: Additional Benefits of Randomized Controlled Trials for Improving Health Care Delivery

Affiliations

Beyond Causality: Additional Benefits of Randomized Controlled Trials for Improving Health Care Delivery

Marcella Alsan et al. Milbank Q. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Policy Points Policymakers at federal and state agencies, health systems, payers, and providers need rigorous evidence for strategies to improve health care delivery and population health. This is all the more urgent now, during the COVID-19 pandemic and its aftermath, especially among low-income communities and communities of color. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are known for their ability to produce credible causal impact estimates, which is why they are used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drugs and, increasingly, to evaluate health care delivery and policy. But RCTs provide other benefits, allowing policymakers and researchers to: 1) design studies to answer the question they want to answer, 2) test theory and mechanisms to help enrich understanding beyond the results of a single study, 3) examine potentially subtle, indirect effects of a program or policy, and 4) collaborate closely to generate policy-relevant findings. Illustrating each of these points with examples of recent RCTs in health care, we demonstrate how policymakers can utilize RCTs to solve pressing challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomized Controlled Trials Can Make Credibly Estimating Causal Impact Easier: A Stylized Illustration of Health Insurance's Impact on Health [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Lind J. A Treatise of the Scurvy, in Three Parts; Containing an Inquiry into the Nature, Causes, and Cure, of That Disease. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2014.
    1. Hart P. A change in scientific approach: from alternation to randomised allocation in clinical trials in the 1940s. BMJ. 1999;319(7209):572‐573. 10.1136/bmj.319.7209.572/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bothwell L, Podolsky S. The emergence of the randomized, controlled trial. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(6):501‐504. 10.1056/nejmp1604635. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Courtin E, Kim S, Song S, Yu W, Muennig P. Can social policies improve health? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 38 randomized trials. Milbank Q. 2020;98(2):297‐371. 10.1111/1468-0009.12451. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Newhouse J. Free for All?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993.

MeSH terms