Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 21;16(7):e0253510.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253510. eCollection 2021.

The introduction of a mandatory mask policy was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 cases in a major metropolitan city

Affiliations

The introduction of a mandatory mask policy was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 cases in a major metropolitan city

Nick Scott et al. PLoS One. .

Expression of concern in

Abstract

Background: Whilst evidence of use of face masks in reducing COVID-19 cases is increasing, the impact of mandatory use across a large population has been difficult to assess. Introduction of mandatory mask use on July 22, 2020 during a resurgence of COVID-19 in Melbourne, Australia created a situation that facilitated an assessment of the impact of the policy on the epidemic growth rate as its introduction occurred in the absence of other changes to restrictions.

Methods and findings: Exponential epidemic growth or decay rates in daily COVID-19 diagnoses were estimated using a non-weighted linear regression of the natural logarithm of the daily cases against time, using a linear spline model with one knot (lspline package in R v 3.6.3). The model's two linear segments pivot around the hinge day, on which the mask policy began to take effect, 8 days following the introduction of the policy. We used two forms of data to assess change in mask usage: images of people wearing masks in public places obtained from a major media outlet and population-based survey data. Potential confounding factors (including daily COVID-19 tests, number of COVID-19 cases among population subsets affected differentially by the mask policy-e.g., healthcare workers) were examined for their impact on the results. Daily cases fitted an exponential growth in the first log-linear segment (k = +0.042, s.e. = 0.007), and fitted an exponential decay in the second (k = -0.023, s.e. = 0.017) log-linear segment. Over a range of reported serial intervals for SARS-CoV-2 infection, these growth rates correspond to a 22-33% reduction in an effective reproduction ratio before and after mandatory mask use. Analysis of images of people in public spaces showed mask usage rose from approximately 43% to 97%. Analysis of survey data found that on the third day before policy introduction, 44% of participants reported "often" or "always" wearing a mask; on the fourth day after, 100% reported "always" doing so. No potentially confounding factors were associated with the observed change in growth rates.

Conclusions: The mandatory mask use policy substantially increased public use of masks and was associated with a significant decline in new COVID-19 cases after introduction of the policy. This study strongly supports the use of masks for controlling epidemics in the broader community.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BC serves on the National COVID-19 Health Research Advisory Committee that provides guidance to the Federal Government’s COVID-19 response. NS, MH, A Saeri, EG and LS provide guidance to the Victorian Government’s COVID-19 response. MH and NS receive funding from the Victorian Government for the Optimise Study and COVID-19 modelling work. A Saeri and EG receive funding from the Victorian Government for the SCRUB project. CRM serves on the National COVID-19 Health Research Advisory Committee that provides guidance to the Federal Government’s COVID-19 response. She currently receives funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council and Medical Research Futures Fund, Office of Health Protection, Department of Health, Sanofi and from the Defence Intelligence Organisation. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. COVID-19 cases detected per day in Victoria.
Observed daily cases (dots) and fitted linear spline model with a hinge day on 31st July, with shading representing upper and lower 95% confidence interval of the fitted curves. Red: analysis period for pre-masks; Blue: analysis period for post-masks.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Results from the SCRUB survey.
Left: for Round 6 respondents (20–26 July) in Victorian Stage 4 restriction areas, reported frequency of mask use in the past 7 days. Numbers on top of bars represent total respondents. Right: the percentage of respondents who reported always or often wearing a mask over time, Victorian Stage 4 restriction areas and compared to major cities in other states. The number of respondents varied from survey to survey and state to state but averaged 38.6 for each state and time point and the details are listed in S1 File.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saul A, Scott N, Crabb BS, Majumdar SS, Coghlan B, Hellard ME. Impact of Victoria’s Stage 3 lockdown on COVID-19 case numbers. Med J Aust. 2020;213(11):494–6 e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50872 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. Updates about the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). [updated May 20, 2021; cited May 21, 2021]. Available from: https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/coronavirus/updates.
    1. Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. Updates about the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). 2020 [updated November 17, 2020; cited 2021 January 31]. Available from: https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/coronavirus/updates.
    1. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Considerations for Wearing Masks: Help Slow the Spread of COVID-19 2020 [updated April 19, 2021; cited May 21, 2021]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-fac....
    1. Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schunemann HJ, et al.. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):1973–87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed