The introduction of a mandatory mask policy was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 cases in a major metropolitan city
- PMID: 34288910
- PMCID: PMC8294480
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253510
The introduction of a mandatory mask policy was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 cases in a major metropolitan city
Expression of concern in
-
Expression of Concern: The introduction of a mandatory mask policy was associated with significantly reduced COVID-19 cases in a major metropolitan city.PLoS One. 2023 Apr 21;18(4):e0284939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284939. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37083861 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Whilst evidence of use of face masks in reducing COVID-19 cases is increasing, the impact of mandatory use across a large population has been difficult to assess. Introduction of mandatory mask use on July 22, 2020 during a resurgence of COVID-19 in Melbourne, Australia created a situation that facilitated an assessment of the impact of the policy on the epidemic growth rate as its introduction occurred in the absence of other changes to restrictions.
Methods and findings: Exponential epidemic growth or decay rates in daily COVID-19 diagnoses were estimated using a non-weighted linear regression of the natural logarithm of the daily cases against time, using a linear spline model with one knot (lspline package in R v 3.6.3). The model's two linear segments pivot around the hinge day, on which the mask policy began to take effect, 8 days following the introduction of the policy. We used two forms of data to assess change in mask usage: images of people wearing masks in public places obtained from a major media outlet and population-based survey data. Potential confounding factors (including daily COVID-19 tests, number of COVID-19 cases among population subsets affected differentially by the mask policy-e.g., healthcare workers) were examined for their impact on the results. Daily cases fitted an exponential growth in the first log-linear segment (k = +0.042, s.e. = 0.007), and fitted an exponential decay in the second (k = -0.023, s.e. = 0.017) log-linear segment. Over a range of reported serial intervals for SARS-CoV-2 infection, these growth rates correspond to a 22-33% reduction in an effective reproduction ratio before and after mandatory mask use. Analysis of images of people in public spaces showed mask usage rose from approximately 43% to 97%. Analysis of survey data found that on the third day before policy introduction, 44% of participants reported "often" or "always" wearing a mask; on the fourth day after, 100% reported "always" doing so. No potentially confounding factors were associated with the observed change in growth rates.
Conclusions: The mandatory mask use policy substantially increased public use of masks and was associated with a significant decline in new COVID-19 cases after introduction of the policy. This study strongly supports the use of masks for controlling epidemics in the broader community.
Conflict of interest statement
BC serves on the National COVID-19 Health Research Advisory Committee that provides guidance to the Federal Government’s COVID-19 response. NS, MH, A Saeri, EG and LS provide guidance to the Victorian Government’s COVID-19 response. MH and NS receive funding from the Victorian Government for the Optimise Study and COVID-19 modelling work. A Saeri and EG receive funding from the Victorian Government for the SCRUB project. CRM serves on the National COVID-19 Health Research Advisory Committee that provides guidance to the Federal Government’s COVID-19 response. She currently receives funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council and Medical Research Futures Fund, Office of Health Protection, Department of Health, Sanofi and from the Defence Intelligence Organisation. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The Impact of Mask Mandates on Face Mask Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 11;9:e42616. doi: 10.2196/42616. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023. PMID: 36446134 Free PMC article.
-
Mask use, risk-mitigation behaviours and pandemic fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic in five cities in Australia, the UK and USA: A cross-sectional survey.Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.056. Epub 2021 Mar 23. Int J Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33771668 Free PMC article.
-
Mask-wearing and control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the USA: a cross-sectional study.Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Mar;3(3):e148-e157. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30293-4. Epub 2021 Jan 19. Lancet Digit Health. 2021. PMID: 33483277 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to mask-wearing and its impact on the incidence and deaths of viral respiratory infectious diseases: a systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling study.BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Feb 19;10(2):e017087. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017087. BMJ Glob Health. 2025. PMID: 39971586 Free PMC article.
-
Community Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State Mandates In The US.Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Aug;39(8):1419-1425. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00818. Epub 2020 Jun 16. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020. PMID: 32543923 Review.
Cited by
-
The Impact of Mask Mandates on Face Mask Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 11;9:e42616. doi: 10.2196/42616. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023. PMID: 36446134 Free PMC article.
-
Considerations and concerns regarding the readiness to remove face coverings.J Glob Health. 2022 Jun 21;12:03036. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.03036. J Glob Health. 2022. PMID: 35801563 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination for Healthcare Professionals and Its Association With General Vaccination Knowledge: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey in Cyprus.Front Public Health. 2022 May 11;10:897526. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.897526. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35646772 Free PMC article.
-
Health care workers' perceptions of their hospitals' preparedness during the COVID-19 virus pandemic in three different world regions.Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 May-Jun;21:101278. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101278. Epub 2023 Apr 2. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023. PMID: 37033720 Free PMC article.
-
Priority populations' experiences of isolation, quarantine and distancing for COVID-19: protocol for a longitudinal cohort study (Optimise Study).BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):e076907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076907. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38216183 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. Updates about the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). [updated May 20, 2021; cited May 21, 2021]. Available from: https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/coronavirus/updates.
-
- Victorian Department of Health and Human Services. Updates about the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). 2020 [updated November 17, 2020; cited 2021 January 31]. Available from: https://www.dhhs.vic.gov.au/coronavirus/updates.
-
- Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Considerations for Wearing Masks: Help Slow the Spread of COVID-19 2020 [updated April 19, 2021; cited May 21, 2021]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-fac....
-
- Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schunemann HJ, et al.. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):1973–87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous