Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 21;19(1):114.
doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00800-6.

Mifepristone inhibited the expression of B7-H2, B7-H3, B7-H4 and PD-L2 in adenomyosis

Affiliations

Mifepristone inhibited the expression of B7-H2, B7-H3, B7-H4 and PD-L2 in adenomyosis

Xiaoyan Qin et al. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: The immune mechanism was shown to be involved in the development of adenomyosis. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the expression of the immune checkpoints B7-H2, B7-H3, B7-H4 and PD-L2 in adenomyosis and to explore the effect of mifepristone on the expression of these immune checkpoints.

Methods: The expression of B7-H2, B7-H3, B7-H4 and PD-L2 in normal endometria and adenomyosis patient samples treated with or without mifepristone was determined by immunohistochemistry analysis.

Results: In adenomyosis patient samples, the expression of B7-H2, B7-H3 and B7-H4 was increased in the eutopic and ectopic endometria compared with normal endometria, both in the proliferative and secretory phases. Moreover, the expression of B7-H2 and B7-H3 was higher in adenomyotic lesions than in the corresponding eutopic endometria, both in the proliferative and secretory phases. The expression of PD-L2 was higher in adenomyotic lesions than in normal endometria in both the proliferative and secretory phases. In the secretory phase but not the proliferative phase, the expression of B7-H4 and PD-L2 in adenomyotic lesions was significantly higher than that in the corresponding eutopic endometria. In normal endometria and eutopic endometria, the expression of B7-H4 was elevated in the proliferative phase compared with that in the secretory phase, while in the ectopic endometria, B7-H4 expression was decreased in the proliferative phase compared with the secretory phase. In addition, the expression of B7-H2, B7-H3, B7-H4 and PD-L2 was significantly decreased in adenomyosis tissues after treatment with mifepristone.

Conclusions: The expression of the immune checkpoint proteins B7-H2, B7-H3, B7-H4 and PD-L2 is upregulated in adenomyosis tissues and is downregulated with mifepristone treatment. The data suggest that B7 immunomodulatory molecules are involved in the pathophysiology of adenomyosis.

Keywords: Adenomyosis; B7-H2; B7-H3; B7-H4; Mifepristone; PD-L2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Immunoexpression and comparison of B7-H2 in normal, eutopic and ectopic endometrium of adenomyosis treated with and without mifepristone. a Ectopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); b Ectopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); c Eutopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); d Eutopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); e Normal endometrium of proliferative phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 47); f Normal endometrium of secretory phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 27); g Ectopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); h and i Eutopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); j Immunoscore comparation of B7-H2 between each groups,* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. a- i magnification: × 100
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Immunoexpression and comparison of B7-H3 in normal, eutopic and ectopic endometrium of adenomyosis treated with and without mifepristone. a Ectopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); b Ectopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); c Eutopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); d Eutopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); e Normal endometrium of proliferative phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 47); f Normal endometrium of secretory phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 27); g Ectopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); h and i eutopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); j Immunoscore comparation of B7-H3 between each groups, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. a- i magnification: × 100;
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Immunoexpression and comparison of B7-H4 in normal, eutopic and ectopic endometrium of adenomyosis treated with and without mifepristone. a Ectopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); b Ectopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); c Eutopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); d Eutopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); e Normal endometrium of proliferative phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 47); f Normal endometrium of secretory phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 27); g Ectopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); h and i Eutopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); j Immunoscore comparation of B7-H4 between each groups,* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. a- i magnification: × 100
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Immunoexpression and comparison of PD-L2 in normal, eutopic and ectopic endometrium of adenomyosis treated with and without mifepristone. a Ectopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); b Ectopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); c Eutopic endometrium of proliferative phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 35); d Eutopic endometrium of secretory phase in patient with untreated adenomyosis (n = 23); e Normal endometrium of proliferative phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 47); f Normal endometrium of secretory phase in patients without adenomyosis (n = 27); g Ectopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); h and i. Eutopic endometrium in patient with mifepristone-treated adenomyosis (n = 11); j Immunoscore comparation of PD-L2 between each groups,* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01. a- i magnification: × 100;
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Schematic representation of B7-H2, B7-H3, B7-H4 and PD-L2 with their respective receptor

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(4):529–538. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1191-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Solares J, Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans MM. Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lagana AS, Garzon S, Gotte M, Vigano P, Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Martin DC. The Pathogenesis of Endometriosis: Molecular and Cell Biology Insights. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5615. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225615. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lagana AS, Salmeri FM, Ban FH, Ghezzi F, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Granese R. Evaluation of M1 and M2 macrophages in ovarian endometriomas from women affected by endometriosis at different stages of the disease. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(5):441–444. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1683821. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bourdon M, Santulli P, Jeljeli M, Vannuccini S, Marcellin L, Doridot L, Petraglia F, Batteux F, Chapron C. Immunological changes associated with adenomyosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(1):108–129. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa038. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances