Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 21;22(1):472.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05423-1.

Trends in clinical trial registration in sub-Saharan Africa between 2010 and 2020: a cross-sectional review of three clinical trial registries

Affiliations

Trends in clinical trial registration in sub-Saharan Africa between 2010 and 2020: a cross-sectional review of three clinical trial registries

Bassey Edem et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Objective: Prospective registration of clinical trials is an ethical, scientific, and legal requirement that serves several functions, including minimising research wastage and publication bias. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is increasingly hosting clinical trials over the past few years, and there is limited literature on trends in clinical trial registration and reporting in SSA. Therefore, we set out to determine the trends in clinical trials registered in SSA countries between 2010 and July 2020.

Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used to describe the type of clinical trials that are conducted in SSA from 1 January 2010 to 31 July 2020. The registries searched were ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG), the Pan African Clinical Trials Register (PACTR), and the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN). Data were extracted into Excel and imported into STATA for descriptive analysis.

Results: CTG had the highest number of registered trials at 2622, followed by PACTR with 1501 and ISRCTN with 507 trials. Trials were observed to increase gradually from 2010 and peaked at 2018-2019. Randomised trials were the commonest type, accounting for at least 80% across the three registries. Phase three trials investigating drugs targeted at infections/infestations were the majority. Few completed trials had their results posted: 58% in ISRCTN and 16.5% in CTG, thus suggesting reporting bias.

Conclusion: Despite the gradual increase in clinical trials registered during the period, recent trends suggest a drop in the number of trials registered across the region. Strengthening national and regional regulatory capacity will improve clinical trial registration and minimise reporting bias in completed clinical trials.

Keywords: Clinical trial registration; Sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart describing data extraction by registry. The three registries had varying levels of flexibility during data extraction. With CTG, it was possible to apply filters directly for countries in SSA for the study period. PACTR and ISRCTN had limited flexibility, and components of the data which was not required are excluded as shown in the flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Top ten countries where the highest numbers of trials are registered in sub-Saharan Africa between 2010 and 2020
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Trends in clinical trial registration in sub-Saharan Africa between 2010 and 2019 across three registries
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Completed clinical trials with results by registry

References

    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Clinical trials registration [Internet]. ICMJE. 2020 [cited 21 May 2020]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/about-icmje/faqs/clinical-trials-registration/.
    1. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects – WMA – The World Medical Association [Internet]. World Medical Association. [cited 11 Jun 2021]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-pr....
    1. US National Library of Medicine. History, policies, and laws [Internet]. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2020 [cited 17 Nov 2020]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/about-site/history.
    1. Chan AW, Hróbjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291(20):2457–2465. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.20.2457. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ICMJE. Clinical trials [Internet]. [cited 17 Nov 2020]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-iss....