Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;12(2):279-285.
doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01281-0. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

A Prospective Observational Study to Determine Rate of Thromboprophylaxis in Oncology Patients Undergoing Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery

Affiliations

A Prospective Observational Study to Determine Rate of Thromboprophylaxis in Oncology Patients Undergoing Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery

Shailesh V Shrikhande et al. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer and is a leading cause of death. In addition to the hypercoagulable state associated with malignancy, cancer-related surgery and subsequent immobilization further increase the risk of VTE. Guidelines suggest extended prophylaxis up to 4 weeks with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in such patients. This study is conducted to determine the proportion of patients receiving thromboprophylaxis among those undergoing surgery for malignant abdominal or pelvic tumor. This prospective, multicenter, observational study included 300 patients (217 [72.3%] were women). Mean age and duration of cancer were 53.2 and 1.2 years, respectively. A total of 162 (54%) patients received thromboprophylaxis of which only pharmacological in 78 [48.1%], only mechanical in 27 [16.7%], and both pharmacological and mechanical in 57 [35.2%] patients. LMWH (128, 79.0%) and graduated compression stockings (74, 45.7%) were the commonly used modalities. VTE prophylaxis was given in only half of the patients. Physician education to increase adherence to international guidelines is very important. Trial Registration No. CTRI/2013/05/003617.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-021-01281-0.

Keywords: Doppler; Low-molecular-weight heparin; Observational study; Pelvic neoplasms; Ultrasonography; Venous thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestGastro-intestinal disease management group of Tata Memorial Hospital received honorarium for conducting this study. Manish Verma is an employee of Sanofi.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lyman GH. Preventing venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: can we do better? Journal of Oncology Practice. 2009;5:165–166. doi: 10.1200/JOP.0941501. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blom JW, Doggen CJ, Osanto S, Rosendaal FR. Malignancies, prothrombotic mutations, and the risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2005;293:715–722. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.6.715. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee A, Stephen E, Agarwal S, Premkumar P. Venous thrombo-embolism in India. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:482–485. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.11.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kakkar AK, Williamson R, editors. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis; 1998 - PubMed
    1. Yang S-S, Yu CS, Yoon YS, Yoon SN, Lim S-B, Kim JC. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism in Asian colorectal cancer surgery patients. World J Surg. 2011;35:881–887. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-0957-2. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources