Soil carbon response to long-term biosolids application
- PMID: 34292633
- DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20270
Soil carbon response to long-term biosolids application
Abstract
Astudy was conducted in three agroecosystems in California (Sacramento, Solano, and Merced counties) that received biosolids applications for 20 yr. Management varied in application rates and frequencies, resulting in average cumulative amount of biosolids applied of 74 (Solano), 105 (Merced), and 359 (Sacramento) Mg biosolidsdry ha-1 , resulting in the addition of 26 (Solano), 36 (Merced), and 125 (Sacramento) Mg biosolids-C ha-1 . Measurements included soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (N) concentrations from 0 to 100 cm and microbial biomass C (MBC) and microbial biomass N (MBN) from 0 to 30 cm in biosolids-amended and control sites. Biosolids treatments had greater amounts of SOC and total N at all sites, and MBC and MBN were greatest at Sacramento and Solano. The largest increases in SOC were at the site that received the lowest cumulative loading rate of biosolids (Solano), where SOC content to 100 cm was 50% greater in amended soils (p < .001). Net changes in soil C stocks to 30 cm were 0.4 ± 0.1 (Solano), -0.04 ± 0.1 (Merced), and 0.3 ± 0.2 (Sacramento) Mg C ha-1 yr-1 . These values change when considering deeper soil depths (0-100 cm) to 0.5 ± 0.1 (Solano), 0.2 ± 0.2 (Merced), and 0.216 ± 0.2 (Sacramento) Mg C ha-1 yr-1 , reflecting differences in C stocks changes in surface and subsurface soils across sites. Rates of C storage per dry Mg of biosolids per year applied were 1 ± 0.2 (Solano), 0.5 ± 0.4 (Merced), and 0.04 ± 0.1 (Sacramento). Our results suggest that local controls on soil C stabilization are more important than amendment application amount at predicting climate benefits and that accounting for soil C changes below 30 cm can provide insight for sequestering C in agroecosystems.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Environmental Quality © 2021 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Albaladejo, J., Lopez, J., Boix-Fayos, C., Barbera, G. G., & Martinez-Mena, M. (2008). Long-term effect of a single application of organic refuse on carbon sequestration and soil physical properties. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37, 2093-2099. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0653
-
- Avery, E., Krzic, M., Wallace, B., Newman, R. F., Smukler, S. M., & Bradfield, G. E. (2018). One-time application of biosolids to ungrazed semiarid rangelands: 14 yr soil responses. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 98, 696-708. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2018-0102
-
- Bai, Y., Mei, L., Zuo, W., Zhang, Y., Gu, C., Shan, Y., Hu, J., & Dai, Q. (2019). Response of bacterial communities in coastal mudflat saline soil to sewage sludge amendment. Applied Soil Ecology, 144, 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.07.007
-
- Beck, T., Joergensen, R. G., Kandeler, E., Makeschin, F., Nuss, E., Oberholzer, H. R., & Scheu, S. (1997). An inter-laboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29, 1023-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00030-8
-
- Brown, S., Kurtz, K., Bary, A., & Cogger, C. (2011). Quantifying benefits associated with land application of organic residuals in Washington State. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 7451-7458.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous