Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 6:12:647830.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647830. eCollection 2021.

Obligation or Desire: Variation in Motivation for Compliance With COVID-19 Public Health Guidance

Ting Ai  1 , Glenn Adams  1 , Xian Zhao  2
Affiliations

Obligation or Desire: Variation in Motivation for Compliance With COVID-19 Public Health Guidance

Ting Ai et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Why do people comply with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health guidance? This study considers cultural-psychological foundations of variation in beliefs about motivations for such compliance. Specifically, we focused on beliefs about two sources of prosocial motivation: desire to protect others and obligation to society. Across two studies, we observed that the relative emphasis on the desire to protect others (vs. the obligation to the community) as an explanation for compliance was greater in the United States settings associated with cultural ecologies of abstracted independence than in Chinese settings associated with cultural ecologies of embedded interdependence. We observed these patterns for explanations of psychological experience of both others (Study 1) and self (Study 2), and for compliance with mandates for both social distancing and face masks (Study 2). Discussion of results considers both practical implications for motivating compliance with public health guidance and theoretical implications for denaturalizing prevailing accounts of prosocial motivation.

Keywords: COVID-19; compliance; culture; obligation; prosocial motivation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study 1—the relative importance of desire and obligation motivation for American and Chinese participants. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals of the mean.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study 1—the importance ratings of desire and obligation motivation for American and Chinese participants. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals of the mean.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study 1—the autonomous and controlled motivation from Motivation to Help Scale for American and Chinese participants. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals of the mean.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Study 2—the importance ratings of desire and obligation motivation for wearing face masks (left) and keeping social distance (right) for American and Chinese participants. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals of the mean.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Study 2—the relative importance of desire and obligation motivation for the self for American and Chinese participants. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals of the mean.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Study 2—the importance rating of desire and obligation motivation for the self for American and Chinese participants. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals of the mean.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adams G. (2005). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: enemyship in North American and West African worlds. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88, 948–968. 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.948 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adams G., Anderson S. L., Adonu J. K. (2004). The cultural grounding of closeness and intimacy, in Handbook of Closeness and Intimacy, eds Mashek D., Aron A. (London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; ), 321–339.
    1. Adams G., Estrada-Villalta S., Sullivan D., Markus H. R. (2019). The psychology of neoliberalism and the neoliberalism of psychology. J. Soc. Issues. 75, 189–216. 10.1111/josi.12305 - DOI
    1. Adams G., Kurtiş T. (2018). Context in person, person in context: a cultural psychology approach to social–personality psychology, in The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology (2nd Ed.), eds Deaux K., Snyder M. (New York: Oxford University Press; ), 1–52. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190224837.013.8 - DOI
    1. Atalay S., Solmazer G. (2021). The relationship between cultural value orientations and the changes in mobility during the Covid-19 pandemic: a national-level analysis. Front. Psychol. 12:578190. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.578190 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources