Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 31;2(2):tgab038.
doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab038. eCollection 2021.

Cerebellar and Cortical Correlates of Internal and External Speech Error Monitoring

Affiliations

Cerebellar and Cortical Correlates of Internal and External Speech Error Monitoring

Elin Runnqvist et al. Cereb Cortex Commun. .

Abstract

An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study examined how speakers inspect their own speech for errors. Concretely, we sought to assess 1) the role of the temporal cortex in monitoring speech errors, linked with comprehension-based monitoring; 2) the involvement of the cerebellum in internal and external monitoring, linked with forward modeling; and 3) the role of the medial frontal cortex for internal monitoring, linked with conflict-based monitoring. In a word production task priming speech errors, we observed enhanced involvement of the right posterior cerebellum for trials that were correct, but on which participants were more likely to make a word as compared with a nonword error (contrast of internal monitoring). Furthermore, comparing errors to correct utterances (contrast of external monitoring), we observed increased activation of the same cerebellar region, of the superior medial cerebellum, and of regions in temporal and medial frontal cortex. The presence of the cerebellum for both internal and external monitoring indicates the use of forward modeling across the planning and articulation of speech. Dissociations across internal and external monitoring in temporal and medial frontal cortex indicate that monitoring of overt errors is more reliant on vocal feedback control.

Keywords: cerebellum; error monitoring; fMRI; forward modeling; speech production.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Depiction of the experimental design and procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent signal change in the 11 predefined ROI (location in the brain in top central panel) for (A) the internal monitoring contrast and (B) the external monitoring contrast. ROIs in medial frontal cortex are represented with blue tones, ROIs in the cerebellum in green tones and ROIs in temporal cortex in red tones. The asterisks indicate significant effects <0.05 (*) or <0.005 (**) after correcting for multiple comparisons using FDR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
RFX results on the BOLD response of internal monitoring (lexical vs. nonlexical error priming; panel A) and external monitoring (errors vs. correct trials; panel B). Statistical t-maps are overlaid on MNI cortex slices (5 axial slices and 1 sagittal slice per line) using a voxelwise threshold of P < .001 and an extent threshold of 25 voxels.

References

    1. Abel S, Dressel K, Weiller C, Huber W. 2012. Enhancement and suppression in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm. Brain Behav. 2(2):109–127. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ackermann H, Vogel M, Petersen D, Poremba M. 1992. Speech deficits in ischaemic cerebellar lesions. J Neurol. 239(4):223–227. - PubMed
    1. Argyropoulos GP. 2016. The cerebellum, internal models and prediction in ‘non-motor’ aspects of language: a critical review. Brain Lang. 161:4–17. - PubMed
    1. Baars BJ, Motley MT, MacKay DG. 1975. Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav. 14(4):382–391.
    1. Barlow H. 2001. Redundancy reduction revisited. Network. 12(3):241–253. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources