Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;29(1):366-375.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10464-6. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Mushegh A Sahakyan #  1   2   3 , Caroline S Verbeke #  4   5 , Tore Tholfsen  6 , Dejan Ignjatovic  4   7 , Dyre Kleive  6 , Trond Buanes  4 , Kristoffer Lassen  6   8 , Bård I Røsok  6 , Knut Jørgen Labori  4   6 , Bjørn Edwin  9   4   6
Affiliations

Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Mushegh A Sahakyan et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Resection margin status is considered one of the few surgeon-controlled parameters affecting prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While studies mostly focus on resection margins in pancreatoduodenectomy, little is known about their role in distal pancreatectomy (DP). This study aimed to investigate resection margins in DP for PDAC.

Methods: Patients who underwent DP for PDAC between October 2004 and February 2020 were included (n = 124). Resection margins and associated parameters were studied in two consecutive time periods during which different pathology examination protocols were used: non-standardized (period 1: 2004-2014) and standardized (period 2: 2015-2020). Microscopic margin involvement (R1) was defined as ≤1 mm clearance.

Results: Laparoscopic and open resections were performed in 117 (94.4%) and 7 (5.6%) patients, respectively. The R1 rate for the entire cohort was 73.4%, increasing from 60.4% in period 1 to 83.1% in period 2 (p = 0.005). A significantly higher R1 rate was observed for the posterior margin (35.8 vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001) and anterior pancreatic surface (based on a 0 mm clearance; 18.9 vs. 35.4%, p = 0.045). Pathology examination period, poorly differentiated PDAC, and vascular invasion were associated with R1 in the multivariable model. Extended DP, positive anterior pancreatic surface, lymph node ratio, perineural invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy, but not R1, were significant prognostic factors for overall survival in the entire cohort.

Conclusions: Pathology examination is a key determinant of resection margin status following DP for PDAC. A high R1 rate is to be expected when pathology examination is meticulous and standardized. Involvement of the anterior pancreatic surface affects prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Survival Following standard (R0/R1) and extended distal pancreatectomy in patients with non-metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cum cumulative, CI confidence interval
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Chiorean EG, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2019. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(3):202–210. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnston WC, Hoen HM, Cassera MA, et al. Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: review of the National Cancer Data Base. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(1):21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.07.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Konstantinidis IT, Warshaw AL, Allen JN, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a “true” R0 resection? Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):731–736. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318263da2f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Howard TJ, Krug JE, Yu J, et al. A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon's contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(10):1338–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.09.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chandrasegaram MD, Goldstein D, Simes J, et al. Meta-analysis of radical resection rates and margin assessment in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102(12):1459–1472. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9892. - DOI - PubMed