Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 18;13(14):3600.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13143600.

Signed in Blood: Circulating Tumor DNA in Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment and Screening

Affiliations
Review

Signed in Blood: Circulating Tumor DNA in Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment and Screening

Jacob J Adashek et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

With the addition of molecular testing to the oncologist's diagnostic toolbox, patients have benefitted from the successes of gene- and immune-directed therapies. These therapies are often most effective when administered to the subset of malignancies harboring the target identified by molecular testing. An important advance in the application of molecular testing is the liquid biopsy, wherein circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is analyzed for point mutations, copy number alterations, and amplifications by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The advantages of evaluating ctDNA over tissue DNA include (i) ctDNA requires only a tube of blood, rather than an invasive biopsy, (ii) ctDNA can plausibly reflect DNA shedding from multiple metastatic sites while tissue DNA reflects only the piece of tissue biopsied, and (iii) dynamic changes in ctDNA during therapy can be easily followed with repeat blood draws. Tissue biopsies allow comprehensive assessment of DNA, RNA, and protein expression in the tumor and its microenvironment as well as functional assays; however, tumor tissue acquisition is costly with a risk of complications. Herein, we review the ways in which ctDNA assessment can be leveraged to understand the dynamic changes of molecular landscape in cancers.

Keywords: biomarkers; ctDNA; next-generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.J.A. has no conflicts of interest. F.J. has the following conflicts of interest: serves in an advisory role for Asana, Baush Health, Cardiff Oncology, Deciphera, Guardant Health, Ideaya, IFM Therapeutics, Immunomet, Illumina, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, PureTech Health, Sotio, and Synlogic; has stocks in Cardiff Oncology and his institution receives funding from Agios, Asana, Astellas, Astex, Bayer, Bicara, BioMed Valley Discoveries, Bioxcel, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Deciphera, FujiFilm Pharma, Genentech, Ideaya, JS Innopharm, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Novellus, Plexxikon, Proximagen, Sanofi, Sotio, SpringBank Pharmaceuticals, SQZ Biotechnologies, Synlogic, Synthorx, and Symphogen. R.K. has the following conflicts of interest: Stock and Other Equity Interests (IDbyDNA, CureMatch, Inc., and Soluventis); Consulting or Advisory Role (Gaido, LOXO, X-Biotech, Actuate Therapeutics, Roche, NeoMed, and Soluventis); Speaker’s fee (Roche); Research Funding (Incyte, Genentech, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Sequenom, Foundation Medicine, Guardant Health, Grifols, Konica Minolta, and OmniSeq [All institutional]); Board Member and co-Founder (CureMatch, Inc.); Board Member CureMetrix.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ctDNA employed to identify targetable mutations. Blood sample collected and next-generation sequencing performed on shed ctDNA from tumor, which can identify genomic alterations, some of which may be pharmacologically tractable.

References

    1. Husain H., Velculescu V.E. Cancer DNA in the Circulation: The Liquid Biopsy. JAMA. 2017;318:1272–1274. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12131. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turner N.C., Kingston B., Kilburn L.S., Kernaghan S., Wardley A.M., Macpherson I.R., Baird R.D., Roylance R., Stephens P., Oikonomidou O., et al. Circulating tumour DNA analysis to direct therapy in advanced breast cancer (plasmaMATCH): A multicentre, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1296–1308. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30444-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khagi Y., Goodman A.M., Daniels G.A., Patel S.P., Sacco A.G., Randall J.M., Bazhenova L.A., Kurzrock R. Hypermutated Circulating Tumor DNA: Correlation with Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:5729–5736. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1439. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willis J., Lefterova M.I., Artyomenko A., Kasi P.M., Nakamura Y., Mody K., Catenacci D.V.T., Fakih M., Barbacioru C., Zhao J., et al. Validation of Microsatellite Instability Detection Using a Comprehensive Plasma-Based Genotyping Panel. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;25:7035–7045. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1324. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gandara D.R., Paul S.M., Kowanetz M., Schleifman E., Zou W., Li Y., Rittmeyer A., Fehrenbacher L., Otto G., Malboeuf C., et al. Blood-based tumor mutational burden as a predictor of clinical benefit in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with atezolizumab. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1441–1448. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0134-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources