Considerations for Individual-Level Versus Whole-School Physical Activity Interventions: Stakeholder Perspectives
- PMID: 34300080
- PMCID: PMC8304121
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147628
Considerations for Individual-Level Versus Whole-School Physical Activity Interventions: Stakeholder Perspectives
Abstract
Strategies to address declining physical activity levels among children and adolescents have focused on 'individual-level' approaches which often fail to demonstrate impact. Recent attention has been on an alternative 'whole-school' approach to increasing physical activity that involves promoting physical activity throughout all aspects of the school environment. There is, however, a lack of evidence on how whole-school physical activity approaches could be implemented in the UK. This qualitative study explored perspectives of key stakeholders on potential reasons for the lack of impact of individual-level school-based interventions on children's physical activity, and key considerations for adopting a whole-school approach. Nineteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with a range of stakeholders involved in the implementation of physical activity programmes in UK schools. Data were analysed using an inductive approach. Respondents suggested that individual-level school-based interventions to increase physical activity often failed to consult end users in the design and were typically implemented in environments unsupportive of long-term change. They subsequently outlined specific barriers and key facilitators for the adoption and implementation of whole-school approaches in UK settings and recommended a shift in research foci towards building an evidence base around educational outcomes and whole-school implementation insights.
Keywords: physical activity; qualitative research; stakeholder perspective; whole-school approach.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Neither the funder nor the sponsor had a role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Poitras V.J., Gray C.E., Borghese M.M., Carson V., Chaput J.P., Janssen I., Katzmarzyk P.T., Pate R.R., Gorber S.C., Kho M.E., et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2016;41:S197–S239. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tarp J., Child A., White T., Westgate K., Bugge A., Grontved A., Wedderkopp N., Andersen L.B., Cardon G., Davey R., et al. Physical activity intensity, bout-duration, and cardiometabolic risk markers in children and adolescents. Int. J. Obes. 2018;42:1639–1650. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0152-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Biddle S.J.H., Ciaccioni S., Thomas G., Vergeer I. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: An updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2019;42:146–155. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.011. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
