Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 18;18(14):7635.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147635.

Development of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Osteoporosis from Clinical Health Examination Data

Affiliations

Development of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Osteoporosis from Clinical Health Examination Data

Wen-Yu Ou Yang et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Osteoporosis is treatable but often overlooked in clinical practice. We aimed to construct prediction models with machine learning algorithms to serve as screening tools for osteoporosis in adults over fifty years old. Additionally, we also compared the performance of newly developed models with traditional prediction models. Data were acquired from community-dwelling participants enrolled in health checkup programs at a medical center in Taiwan. A total of 3053 men and 2929 women were included. Models were constructed for men and women separately with artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and logistic regression (LoR) to predict the presence of osteoporosis. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the performance of the models. We achieved AUROC of 0.837, 0.840, 0.843, 0.821, 0.827 in men, and 0.781, 0.807, 0.811, 0.767, 0.772 in women, for ANN, SVM, RF, KNN, and LoR models, respectively. The ANN, SVM, RF, and LoR models in men, and the ANN, SVM, and RF models in women performed significantly better than the traditional Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) model. We have demonstrated that machine learning algorithms improve the performance of screening for osteoporosis. By incorporating the models in clinical practice, patients could potentially benefit from earlier diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Keywords: early detection; machine learning; osteoporosis; prediction model; screening tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of data inclusion and preprocessing. DXA: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; HbA1c: Hemoglobin A1c; ALT: alanine transaminase; ALK-P: alkaline phosphatase; TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TSH: thyroid-stimulating hormone.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A)The ROC curves of different machine learning models and the OSTA model for prediction of osteoporosis in men. ANN: Artificial neural network; SVM: Support vector machine; RF: Random Forest; KNN: K-nearest neighbors; LoR: Logistic regression; OSTA: Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asian; ROC curve: Receiver operating characteristic curve. (B) The ROC curves of different machine learning models and the OSTA model for prediction of osteoporosis in women.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A)The ROC curves of different machine learning models and the OSTA model for prediction of osteoporosis in men. ANN: Artificial neural network; SVM: Support vector machine; RF: Random Forest; KNN: K-nearest neighbors; LoR: Logistic regression; OSTA: Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asian; ROC curve: Receiver operating characteristic curve. (B) The ROC curves of different machine learning models and the OSTA model for prediction of osteoporosis in women.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen F.-P., Huang T.-S., Fu T.-S., Sun C.-C., Chao A.-S., Tsai T.-L. Secular trends in incidence of osteoporosis in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based study. Biomed. J. 2018;41:314–320. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2018.08.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lupsa B.C., Insogna K. Bone Health and Osteoporosis. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2015;44:517–530. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2015.05.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raichandani K., Agarwal S., Jain H., Bharwani N. Mortality profile after 2 years of hip fractures in elderly patients treated with early surgery. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma. 2021;18:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curtis E., Moon R.J., Harvey N., Cooper C. The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide. Bone. 2017;104:29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Looker A.C., Melton L.J., 3rd, Harris T.B., Borrud L.G., Shepherd J.A. Prevalence and trends in low femur bone density among older US adults: NHANES 2005-2006 compared with NHANES III. J. Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:64–71. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090706. - DOI - PMC - PubMed