Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 18;10(14):3164.
doi: 10.3390/jcm10143164.

Vasopressor-Sparing Strategies in Patients with Shock: A Scoping-Review and an Evidence-Based Strategy Proposition

Affiliations

Vasopressor-Sparing Strategies in Patients with Shock: A Scoping-Review and an Evidence-Based Strategy Proposition

Pierre-Grégoire Guinot et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Despite the abundant literature on vasopressor therapy, few studies have focused on vasopressor-sparing strategies in patients with shock. We performed a scoping-review of the published studies evaluating vasopressor-sparing strategies by analyzing the results from randomized controlled trials conducted in patients with shock, with a focus on vasopressor doses and/or duration reduction. We analyzed 143 studies, mainly performed in septic shock. Our analysis demonstrated that several pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies are associated with a decrease in the duration of vasopressor therapy. These strategies are as follows: implementing a weaning strategy, vasopressin use, systemic glucocorticoid administration, beta-blockers, and normothermia. On the contrary, early goal directed therapies, including fluid therapy, oral vasopressors, vitamin C, and renal replacement therapy, are not associated with an increase in vasopressor-free days. Based on these results, we proposed an evidence-based vasopressor management strategy.

Keywords: norepinephrine; sepsis; shock; vasopressor; weaning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Principles of vasopressor treatment. MAP—mean arterial pressure; ScVO2—central venous oxygen saturation; pCO2 Gap—difference between partial pressure of CO2 in venous blood and arterial blood; SVV—stroke volume variation; PPV—pulse pressure variation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Algorithm proposed for vasopressor weaning. (A) Basic algorithm. (B) Advanced algorithm based on dynamic arterial elastance analysis. (C) Advanced algorithm based on ventriculo-arterial coupling analysis. EAdyn—dynamic arterial elastance; PPV—pulse pressure variation; SVV—stroke volume variation; Ev—ventricular elastance; EA—arterial elastance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Algorithm proposed for vasopressor weaning. (A) Basic algorithm. (B) Advanced algorithm based on dynamic arterial elastance analysis. (C) Advanced algorithm based on ventriculo-arterial coupling analysis. EAdyn—dynamic arterial elastance; PPV—pulse pressure variation; SVV—stroke volume variation; Ev—ventricular elastance; EA—arterial elastance.

References

    1. Landry D.W., Oliver J.A. The Pathogenesis of Vasodilatory Shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;345:588–595. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra002709. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sakr Y., Reinhart K., Vincent J.-L., Sprung C.L., Moreno R., Ranieri V.M., De Backer D., Payen D. Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study*. Crit. Care Med. 2006;34:589–597. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201896.45809.E3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Backer D., Biston P., Devriendt J., Madl C., Chochrad D., Aldecoa C., Brasseur A., Defrance P., Gottignies P., Vincent J.-L. Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:779–789. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Russell J.A., Walley K.R., Singer J., Gordon A.C., Hébert P.C., Cooper D.J., Holmes C.L., Mehta S., Granton J.T., Storms M.M., et al. Vasopressin versus Norepinephrine Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:877–887. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhodes A., Evans L.E., Alhazzani W., Levy M.M., Antonelli M., Ferrer R., Kumar A., Sevransky J.E., Sprung C.L., Nunnally M.E., et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:304–377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources