Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 16;14(14):3977.
doi: 10.3390/ma14143977.

Recent Advancements in 3D Printing of Polysaccharide Hydrogels in Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Affiliations
Review

Recent Advancements in 3D Printing of Polysaccharide Hydrogels in Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Jakob Naranda et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

The application of hydrogels coupled with 3-dimensional (3D) printing technologies represents a modern concept in scaffold development in cartilage tissue engineering (CTE). Hydrogels based on natural biomaterials are extensively used for this purpose. This is mainly due to their excellent biocompatibility, inherent bioactivity, and special microstructure that supports tissue regeneration. The use of natural biomaterials, especially polysaccharides and proteins, represents an attractive strategy towards scaffold formation as they mimic the structure of extracellular matrix (ECM) and guide cell growth, proliferation, and phenotype preservation. Polysaccharide-based hydrogels, such as alginate, agarose, chitosan, cellulose, hyaluronan, and dextran, are distinctive scaffold materials with advantageous properties, low cytotoxicity, and tunable functionality. These superior properties can be further complemented with various proteins (e.g., collagen, gelatin, fibroin), forming novel base formulations termed "proteo-saccharides" to improve the scaffold's physiological signaling and mechanical strength. This review highlights the significance of 3D bioprinted scaffolds of natural-based hydrogels used in CTE. Further, the printability and bioink formation of the proteo-saccharides-based hydrogels have also been discussed, including the possible clinical translation of such materials.

Keywords: 3D (bio)printing; cartilage tissue engineering; hydrogels; polysaccharides; proteins; proteo-saccharides.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of publications in Pubmed (search performed in April 2021): (a) keywords: “polysaccharides hydrogels” (b) keywords: “cartilage tissue engineering, hydrogel, polysaccharide, 3D printing”.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The schematic overview of the proteo-saccharides combination, their origin, and bioink preparation for hydrogel formation in CTE.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The 3D printed structures from nanocellulose-reinforced alginate hydrogels: (A) Small grid squeezed with tweezers, (B) grid recovery after squeezing, (C) human ear, (D) side view of a sheep meniscus and (E) top view of a sheep meniscus [66].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Agarose-based scaffold: (a) Adjustable features of agarose can result in flexible characteristics, (b) the molecular structure of agarose and schematic of its gelling process [67].
Figure 5
Figure 5
SEM (A,B) and fluorescence microscopy image (B) of a chitosan–alginate scaffold (A) and chondrocyte cells grown on it (B,C) [84].
Figure 6
Figure 6
Development of self-standing and lightweight 3D bioscaffolds with microporous and interconnect microporous morphology from bicomponent ink containing NFC and CMC [102], Further permission related to the material excerpted should be directed to the ACS (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsabm.9b01099 (accessed on 8 May 2021)).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Bio-inspired hydrogel composed of hyaluronic acid and alginate as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting of articular cartilage engineering constructs [78].
Figure 8
Figure 8
Injectable dextran-based hydrogels crosslinked by metal-free click chemistry [110].

References

    1. Eftekhari A., Maleki Dizaj S., Sharifi S., Salatin S., Rahbar Saadat Y., Zununi Vahed S., Samiei M., Ardalan M., Rameshrad M., Ahmadian E., et al. The Use of Nanomaterials in Tissue Engineering for Cartilage Regeneration; Current Approaches and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:536. doi: 10.3390/ijms21020536. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Del Bakhshayesh A.R., Asadi N., Alihemmati A., Tayefi Nasrabadi H., Montaseri A., Davaran S., Saghati S., Akbarzadeh A., Abedelahi A. An Overview of Advanced Biocompatible and Biomimetic Materials for Creation of Replacement Structures in the Musculoskeletal Systems: Focusing on Cartilage Tissue Engineering. J. Biol. Eng. 2019;13:85. doi: 10.1186/s13036-019-0209-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rai V., Dilisio M.F., Dietz N.E., Agrawal D.K. Recent Strategies in Cartilage Repair: A Systemic Review of the Scaffold Development and Tissue Engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2017;105:2343–2354. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36087. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lammi M.J., Piltti J., Prittinen J., Qu C. Challenges in Fabrication of Tissue-Engineered Cartilage with Correct Cellular Colonization and Extracellular Matrix Assembly. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:2700. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092700. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perez R.A., Mestres G. Role of Pore Size and Morphology in Musculo-Skeletal Tissue Regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016;61:922–939. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.087. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources