Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of modified FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer
- PMID: 34301232
- PMCID: PMC8306351
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08605-x
Meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison of modified FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer
Abstract
Background: Modified FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) have been recommended as first-line therapies for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Due to the lack of evidence to directly compare them, we conducted this network meta-analysis to indirectly compare the effectiveness and toxicity of modified FOLFIRINOX and GEM-NAB.
Methods: The eligible retrospective studies on treatments related to modified FOLFIRINOX and GEM-NAB up to 4 April 2020 were searched and assessed. We used the frequentist model to analyze the survival and toxicity data between different treatments. Pooled analysis for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and events of toxicity were analyzed in this study.
Results: Twenty-two studies were involved in this network meta-analysis. The comparisons on OS and PFS showed that modified FOLFIRINOX and GEM-NAB had similar treatment efficacy (OS: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.78-1.63; PFS: HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.85-1.67). GEM-NAB was more effective than modified FOLFIRINOX based on the result of ORR (RR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.04-1.96). Moreover, our analysis showed a similar toxicity profile between modified FOLFIRINOX and GEM-NAB.
Conclusions: The current evidence showed that modified FOLFIRINOX and GEM-NAB were similar in survival and toxicity. Many factors should be considered for in the formulation of optimal treatment, and our meta-analysis could provide some guidance to treatment selection in the first-line setting for advanced PC.
Keywords: Gemcitabine; Modified FOLFIRINOX; Nab-paclitaxel; Network meta-analysis; Pancreatic cancer; Systematic review.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures


References
-
- Ducreux M, Cuhna AS, Caramella C, Hollebecque A, Burtin P, Goere D, Seufferlein T, Haustermans K, Van Laethem JL, Conroy T, et al. Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl 5):v56–v68. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv295. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kang J, Hwang I, Yoo C, Kim KP, Jeong JH, Chang HM, Lee SS, Park DH, Song TJ, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Hong SM, Shin SH, Hwang DW, Song KB, Lee JH, Kim SC, Ryoo BY. Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX as the first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: retrospective analysis. Investig New Drugs. 2018;36(4):732–741. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0598-5. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 81874061/National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Y‑sy2019‑009/Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology‑Shiyao Cancer Research Fund
- 2018CFC846/Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (CN)
- 2019 No. 87/the 7th Wuhan Young and Middle-aged Backbone Talent of Medical Training Project 2019
- 02.01.20049/Shanghai Anticancer Association
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous