Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;9(6):2908-2914.
doi: 10.1002/nop2.999. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

Maintaining reflexivity in qualitative nursing research

Monica Peddle  1
Affiliations

Maintaining reflexivity in qualitative nursing research

Monica Peddle. Nurs Open. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: Reflexivity is central to the construction of knowledge in qualitative research. This purpose of this paper was to outline one approach when using reflexivity as a strategy to ensure quality of the research process.

Design: In this exploratory research, reflexivity was established and maintained by using repeated questionnaires, completed online. Using the approach presented by Bradbury-Jones (2007) and Peshkin's I's, the aim of the research was to identify the researcher's values, beliefs, perspectives and perceptions prevalent in the research.

Methods: Qualitative data were collected in online reflexive questionnaires, completed monthly by the researcher from January 2017 to December 2018. Data analysis used interpretive and reflective reading and inductive processes.

Results: Seventeen questionnaires were analysed. Data indicated use of questionnaires enabled and detailed development of specific strategies to ensure trustworthiness. Importantly, reflexivity, supported by questionnaires, brought about transformation through self-awareness and enlightenment.

Keywords: nursing research; qualitative research; reflexivity; trustworthiness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest has been declared by the author.

References

    1. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. 10.1177/1468794112468475 - DOI
    1. Bradbury‐Jones, C. (2007). Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: Exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's I's. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59(3), 290–298. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04306.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Darawsheh, W. (2014). Reflexivity in research: Promoting rigour, reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 21(12), 560–568. 10.12968/ijtr.2014.21.12.560 - DOI
    1. DeTata, C. (2015). Teaching and assessing non‐technical skills. The Clinical Teacher, 12(3), 219. 10.1111/tct.12352 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dodgson, J. E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 35(2), 220–222. 10.1177/0890334419830990 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources