Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;38(1):123-131.
doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04967-2. Epub 2021 Jul 24.

Primary versus modified secondary closure techniques for persistent tracheocutaneous fistula in pediatric patients

Affiliations

Primary versus modified secondary closure techniques for persistent tracheocutaneous fistula in pediatric patients

Sung Joon Park et al. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed at compating two closure techniques for tracheocutaneous fistulas (TCFs) in pediatric patients.

Methods: A total of 106 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent closure of a persistent TCF between April 2007 and February 2021 at a tertiary pediatric hospital were evaluated, and 103 pediatric patients aged between 12 months and 18 years were included. The clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were compared between TCF closure by primary closure (Group 1) and a modified secondary healing technique (Group 2).

Results: Of the 103 patients, 58 were classified into Group 1, and 45 into Group 2. The mean age at tracheostomy and TCF closure was significantly younger in Group 2, and the interval between decannulation to TCF closure was significantly shorter in Group 2. Procedural time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in Group 2 than Group 1. Group 2 had a significantly lower complication rate, need for revision surgery, and recannulation rate than Group 1.

Conclusions: Modified secondary healing was more efficient in terms of procedural time and hospital stay, and safer (i.e., fewer complications). It is an effective surgical technique for closing a persistent TCF in younger patients more quickly after decannulation compared to primary closure.

Keywords: Decannulation; Pediatric tracheostomy; Persistent tracheocutaneous fistula; Primary closure; Secondary healing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Berry JG, Graham DA, Graham RJ, Zhou J, Putney HL, O’Brien JE et al (2009) Predictors of clinical outcomes and hospital resource use of children after tracheotomy. Pediatrics 124(2):563–572. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-3491 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watters KF (2017) Tracheostomy in infants and children. Respir Care 62(6):799–825. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.05366 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Osborn AJ, de Alarcón A, Hart CK, Cotton RT, Rutter MJ (2013) Tracheocutaneous fistula closure in the pediatric population: should secondary closure be the standard of care? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 149(5):766–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813500761 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colman KL, Mandell DL, Simons JP (2010) Impact of stoma maturation on pediatric tracheostomy-related complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136(5):471–474. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.52 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mahadevan M, Barber C, Salkeld L, Douglas G, Mills N (2007) Pediatric tracheotomy: 17 year review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 71(12):1829–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.08.007 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources