Comparison of translucency and opalescence among different dental monolithic ceramics
- PMID: 34304886
- DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.030
Comparison of translucency and opalescence among different dental monolithic ceramics
Abstract
Statement of problem: Monolithic ceramic restorations designed by computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing are increasingly being used by clinicians. With the introduction of new materials, their optical characteristics also need to be investigated.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the translucency and opalescence of lithium disilicate, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, presintered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material, and multilayer zirconia.
Material and methods: A total of 50 rectangular plates (14×12×1 mm) of 5 monolithic ceramics were prepared in this in vitro study (n=10). Each zirconia specimen was divided into 3 groups of incisal, middle, and gingival thirds. Each group was then evaluated separately. The color parameters of specimens were measured on 3 backgrounds, white, black, and #3 Ivoclar Natural Die Color material, by using a spectrophotometer. The translucency and opalescence of the specimens were determined by the relevant equations, and between-group comparisons were made. One-way ANOVA and Tamhane post hoc tests were used to compare groups (α=.05).
Results: The difference among the groups was significant in translucency (F=137.346, df=6, P<.001), contrast ratio (F=134.148, df=6, P<.001), and opalescence parameters (F=128.028, df=6, P<.001). The 3 zirconia groups (10.87 ±0.54 to 11.88 ±0.26) had a significantly lower translucency than the other groups, and the zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate group (18.14 ±0.74) showed the highest translucency. Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (12.36 ±0.42) had the highest opalescence, and the lowest opalescence was found for polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network (5.43 ±0.28) and the incisal third of zirconia (5.45 ±1.06).
Conclusions: The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and presintered zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate specimens had the highest translucency and opalescence. The studied multilayer zirconia, which had different cubic phase values from incisal to gingival blank, showed similar translucency over the entire range, and differences among different regions were related to chromatic variables.
Copyright © 2021 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effect of thermocycling and bleaching on the translucency and opalescence of monolithic CAD-CAM dental ceramics.J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jun;133(6):1582.e1-1582.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.013. Epub 2025 Apr 4. J Prosthet Dent. 2025. PMID: 40187901
-
Comparing the color match of monolithic CAD-CAM dental ceramics with the VITA Classical shade guide.J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Sep;132(3):605-611. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.024. Epub 2022 Sep 15. J Prosthet Dent. 2024. PMID: 36115709
-
Effect of cement color and tooth-shaded background on the final color of lithium disilicate and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics: An in vitro study.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Mar;33(2):380-386. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12611. Epub 2020 Jun 19. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021. PMID: 32562352
-
Effect of Artificial Aging on Translucency of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics: A Systematic Review.Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2024 May 31;32(2):153-161. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2602Potdukhe09. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2024. PMID: 38299373
-
Optical behaviors, surface treatment, adhesion, and clinical indications of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS): A narrative review.J Dent. 2021 Sep;112:103722. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103722. Epub 2021 Jun 10. J Dent. 2021. PMID: 34118284 Review.
Cited by
-
Translucency of Lithium-Based Silicate Glass-Ceramics Blocks for CAD/CAM Procedures: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;16(19):6441. doi: 10.3390/ma16196441. Materials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37834578 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A comparative study of translucency and color perception in monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate veneers.Heliyon. 2023 Dec 17;10(1):e23789. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23789. eCollection 2024 Jan 15. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38192772 Free PMC article.
-
Surface Characteristics and Color Stability of Dental PEEK Related to Water Saturation and Thermal Cycling.Polymers (Basel). 2022 May 25;14(11):2144. doi: 10.3390/polym14112144. Polymers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35683817 Free PMC article.
-
Optical Behavior of Clear Thermoplastic Dental Materials in a Simulated Oral Environment.Polymers (Basel). 2025 Feb 11;17(4):472. doi: 10.3390/polym17040472. Polymers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40006134 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of ceramic thickness and resin cement colors on the final color of various monolithic CAD/CAM materials.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):1116. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06458-5. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40618088 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous