Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2021 Sep 15;15(5):677-693.
doi: 10.5009/gnl210001.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections

Chi Hyuk Oh et al. Gut Liver. .

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided intervention has gradually become a standard treatment for peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). However, it is difficult to popularize the procedure in Korea because of restrictions on insurance claims regarding the use of endoscopic accessories, as well as the lack of standardized Korean clinical practice guidelines. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy appointed a Task Force to develop medical guidelines by referring to the manual for clinical practice guidelines development prepared by the National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Previous studies on PFCs were searched, and certain studies were selected with the help of experts. Then, a set of key questions was selected, and treatment guidelines were systematically reviewed. Answers to these questions and recommendations were selected via peer review. This guideline discusses endoscopic management of PFCs and makes recommendations on Indications for the procedure, pre-procedural preparations, optimal approach for drainage, procedural considerations (e.g., types of stent, advantages and disadvantages of plastic and metal stents, and accessories), adverse events of endoscopic intervention, and procedural quality issues. This guideline was reviewed by external experts and suggests best practices recommended based on the evidence available at the time of preparation. This will be revised as necessary to address advances and changes in technology and evidence obtained in clinical practice and future studies.

Keywords: Complications; Endoscopy; Pancreatitis; Pseudocyst; Treatment guidelines; acute.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search flowchart. Endoscopic management in peripancreatic fluid collections.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis with acute peripancreatic fluid collections in the left anterior pararenal space.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A pseudocyst in the lesser sac.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Acute necrotic collection with acute necrotizing pancreatitis involving the body and tail of the pancreas.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A large liquefied collection with air bubbles in the bed of the pancreas.

References

    1. Banks PA, Freeman ML Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology, author. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2379–2400. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis: 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102–111. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies [Internet] The Cochrane Collaboration; London: c2011. [cited 2019 Jul 20]. Available from: http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/
    1. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–605. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources