Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22:2021:6612505.
doi: 10.1155/2021/6612505. eCollection 2021.

Evaluation of Combined Financial Incentives and Deposit Contract Intervention for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Evaluation of Combined Financial Incentives and Deposit Contract Intervention for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Daren R Anderson et al. J Smok Cessat. .

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluate whether a combination of financial incentives and deposit contracts improves cessation rates among low- to moderate-income smokers.

Methods: We randomly assigned 311 smokers covered by Medicaid at 12 health clinics in Connecticut to usual care or one of the three treatment arms. Each treatment arm received financial incentives for two months and either (i) nothing further ("incentives only"), (ii) the option to start a deposit contract with incentive earnings after the incentives ended ("commitment"), or (iii) the option to precommit any earned incentives into a deposit contract starting after the incentives ended ("precommitment"). Smoking cessation was confirmed biochemically at two, six, and twelve months.

Results: At two, six, and twelve months after baseline, our estimated treatment effects on cessation are positive but imprecise, with confidence intervals containing effect sizes estimated by prior studies of financial incentives alone and deposit contracts alone. At two months, the odds ratio for quitting was 1.4 in the incentive-only condition (95% CI: 0.5 to 3.5), 2.0 for incentives followed by commitment (95% CI: 0.6 to 6.1), and 1.9 for incentives and precommitment (95% CI: 0.7 to 5.3).

Conclusions: A combined incentive and deposit contract program for Medicaid enrollees, with incentives offering up to $300 for smoking cessation and use of support services, produced a positive but imprecisely estimated effect on biochemically verified cessation relative to usual care and with no detectable difference in cessation rates between the different treatment arms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. McCarthy M., Siahpush M., Shaikh R. A., Sikora Kessler A., Tibbits M. Social disparities in unaided quit attempts among daily current and former smokers: results from the 2010–2011 tobacco use supplement to the current population survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2016;18(8):1705–1710. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang T. W., Asman K., Gentzke A. S., et al. Tobacco product use among adults—United States, 2017. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2018;67(44):1225–1232. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6744a2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Browning K. K., Ferketich A. K., Salsberry P. J., Wewers M. E. Socioeconomic disparity in provider-delivered assistance to quit smoking. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2008;10(1):55–61. doi: 10.1080/14622200701704905. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Christiansen B., Reeder K., Hill M., Baker T. B., Fiore M. C. Barriers to effective tobacco-dependence treatment for the very poor. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2012;73(6):874–884. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.874. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keller P. A., Christiansen B., Kim S. Y., et al. Increasing consumer demand among Medicaid enrollees for tobacco dependence treatment: the Wisconsin “Medicaid covers it” campaign. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2011;25(6):392–395. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.090923-QUAN-311. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources