Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 6:2021:9934486.
doi: 10.1155/2021/9934486. eCollection 2021.

Current Role of Hysterectomy in Pelvic Floor Surgery: Time for Reappraisal? A Review of Current Literature and Expert Discussion

Guenter K Noé  1   2 , Annelize Barnard  3 , Sven Schiermeier  4 , Michael Anapolski  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Current Role of Hysterectomy in Pelvic Floor Surgery: Time for Reappraisal? A Review of Current Literature and Expert Discussion

Guenter K Noé et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Since hysterectomy could be performed with low risk, it has been part of the standard of surgical prolapse therapy for decades. This has not been scrutinized for a long time. In this review, we describe the development of this issue in recent years. The current literature suggests that hysterectomy requires its own indication. The article describes the various options for a uterine-preserving surgical technique and the available data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All 4 authors have no conflict of interest regarding the content of the article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hysterosacropexy in Oxford technique.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Anterior fixation and posterior fixation in hysteropectopexy with PRP 3 × 15 or PRP 3 × 18, respectively.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fothergill W. E. The end results of vaginal operations for genital prolapse. BJOG. 1921;28(2):251–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1921.tb07785.x. - DOI
    1. Heidenreich W., Majewski A., Schneider J. Wandel in der indikationsstellung zur hysterektomie - dargestellt am beispiel des deszensus. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 1985;45(4):251–253. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036454. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeLancey J. O. L. Anatomie aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992;166(6):1717–1728. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-O. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulten S. F. M., Detollenaere R. J., Stekelenburg J., IntHout J., Kluivers K. B., van Eijndhoven H. W. F. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ. 2019;366 doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nygaard I., Brubaker L., Zyczynski H. M., et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309(19):2016–2024. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4919. - DOI - PMC - PubMed