National Trends in Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Usage in Extremely Young Patients Between 2006 and 2016
- PMID: 34307811
- PMCID: PMC8283017
- DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.05.017
National Trends in Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Usage in Extremely Young Patients Between 2006 and 2016
Abstract
Background: Long-term implant durability is a key concern when considering total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients. The ideal bearing surface used in these patients remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in THA bearing surface use from 2006 to 2016 using a large, pediatric national database.
Methods: This was a retrospective review from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2016, using the Kids' Inpatient Database. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision and 10th revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent THA and create cohorts based on bearing surfaces: metal-on-metal, metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC). Annual utilization of each bearing surface and associated patient and hospital demographics were analyzed.
Results: A total of 1004 THAs were identified during the 11-year study period. The annual number of THAs performed increased by 169% from 2006 to 2016. The mean patient age was 17.1 years. The most prevalent bearing surface used in 2006 was CoC (37.3%), metal-on-metal (31.8%) in 2009, and CoP in 2012 and 2016 (50.6% and 64.8%, respectively). From 2006 to 2016, utilization of CoP increased from 5.0% to 64.8%, representing a 1196% increase over the study period.
Conclusions: The number of THAs performed in pediatric patients is increasing significantly. Although CoC was previously the most commonly used bearing surface in this patient population, CoP is currently the most common. Further investigation is needed to determine whether bearing longevity and clinical outcomes with CoP are superior to other bearing surfaces.
Keywords: Bearing surface trends; Pediatric; Total hip arthroplasty.
© 2021 The Authors.
Figures




Similar articles
-
National Trends in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Extremely Young Patients: A Focus on Bearing Surface Usage From 2009 to 2012.J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.061. Epub 2016 Apr 2. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 27430185
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Trends in the United States From 2007 to 2014: The Rise of Ceramic on Polyethylene.J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1757-1763.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.040. Epub 2018 Jan 9. J Arthroplasty. 2018. PMID: 29429883
-
Total Hip Arthroplasty: National Bearing Surface Trends for 20- to 50-Year-Old Patients.Surg Technol Int. 2020 May 28;36:418-425. Surg Technol Int. 2020. PMID: 32359165
-
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3):B5350. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28260601 Review.
-
Advantages and disadvantages of ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty: a review.Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2012 Sep;156(3):204-12. doi: 10.5507/bp.2012.063. Epub 2012 Oct 4. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2012. PMID: 23069885 Review.
References
-
- Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 - PubMed
-
- Fabi D., Levine B., Paprosky W. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: causes and high incidence of early failure. Orthopedics. 2012 - PubMed
-
- Devane P.A., Horne J.G., Ashmore A., Mutimer J., Kim W., Stanley J. Highly cross-linked polyethylene reduces wear and revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year double-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(20):1703. - PubMed
-
- Shrader M.W. Total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the very young patient. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43(3):359. - PubMed