Evaluating Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE) as an estimate of organ doses from routine CT exams derived from Monte Carlo simulations
- PMID: 34309040
- DOI: 10.1002/mp.15128
Evaluating Size-Specific Dose Estimate (SSDE) as an estimate of organ doses from routine CT exams derived from Monte Carlo simulations
Abstract
Purpose: Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) is a metric that adjusts CTDIvol to account for patient size. While not intended to be an estimate of organ dose, AAPM Report 204 notes the difference between the patient organ dose and SSDE is expected to be 10-20%. The purpose of this work was therefore to evaluate SSDE against estimates of organ dose obtained using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation techniques applied to routine exams across a wide range of patient sizes.
Materials and methods: Size-specific dose estimate was evaluated with respect to organ dose based on three routine protocols taken from Siemens scanners: (a) brain parenchyma dose in routine head exams, (b) lung and breast dose in routine chest exams, and (c) liver, kidney, and spleen dose in routine abdomen/pelvis exams. For each exam, voxelized phantom models were created from existing models or derived from clinical patient scans. For routine head exams, 15 patient models were used which consisted of 10 GSF/ICRP voxelized phantom models and five pediatric voxelized patient models created from CT image data. For all exams, the size metric used was water equivalent diameter (Dw ). For the routine chest exams, data from 161 patients were collected with a Dw range of ~16-44 cm. For the routine abdomen/pelvis exams, data from 107 patients were collected with a range of Dw from ~16 to 44 cm. Image data from these patients were segmented to generate voxelized patient models. For routine head exams, fixed tube current (FTC) was used while tube current modulation (TCM) data for body exams were extracted from raw projection data. The voxelized patient models and tube current information were used in detailed MC simulations for organ dose estimation. Organ doses from MC simulation were normalized by CTDIvol and parameterized as a function of Dw . For each patient scan, the SSDE was obtained using Dw and CTDIvol values of each scan, according to AAPM Report 220 for body scans and Report 293 for head scans. For each protocol and each patient, normalized organ doses were compared with SSDE. A one-sided tolerance limit covering 95% (P = 0.95) of the population with 95% confidence (α = 0.05) was used to assess the upper tolerance limit (TU ) between SSDE and normalized organ dose.
Results: For head exams, the TU between SSDE and brain parenchyma dose was observed to be 12.5%. For routine chest exams, the TU between SSDE and lung and breast dose was observed to be 35.6% and 68.3%, respectively. For routine abdomen/pelvis exams, the TU between SSDE and liver, spleen, and kidney dose was observed to be 30.7%, 33.2%, and 33.0%, respectively.
Conclusions: The TU of 20% between SSDE and organ dose was found to be insufficient to cover 95% of the sampled population with 95% confidence for all of the organs and protocols investigated, except for brain parenchyma dose. For the routine body exams, excluding the breasts, a wider threshold difference of ~30-36% would be needed. These results are, however, specific to Siemens scanners.
Keywords: Monte Carlo dose simulations; TCM; routine CT exams; size-specific dose estimate.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Estimating lung, breast, and effective dose from low-dose lung cancer screening CT exams with tube current modulation across a range of patient sizes.Med Phys. 2018 Oct;45(10):4667-4682. doi: 10.1002/mp.13131. Epub 2018 Sep 24. Med Phys. 2018. PMID: 30118143 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating a size-specific dose for helical head CT examinations using Monte Carlo simulation methods.Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):902-912. doi: 10.1002/mp.13301. Epub 2018 Dec 21. Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 30565704 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating fetal dose from tube current-modulated (TCM) and fixed tube current (FTC) abdominal/pelvis CT examinations.Med Phys. 2019 Jun;46(6):2729-2743. doi: 10.1002/mp.13499. Epub 2019 Apr 24. Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 30893477 Free PMC article.
-
CTContour: An open-source Python pipeline for automatic contouring and calculation of mean SSDE along the abdomino-pelvic region for CT images; validation on fifteen systems.Phys Med. 2022 Nov;103:190-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.10.027. Epub 2022 Nov 11. Phys Med. 2022. PMID: 36375228 Review.
-
[Risk-minimizing tube current modulation for computed tomography].Radiologie (Heidelb). 2023 Jul;63(7):523-529. doi: 10.1007/s00117-023-01160-5. Epub 2023 Jun 12. Radiologie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 37306750 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of organ dose using size-specific dose estimation (SSDE) and related cancer risk due to chest CT scan during the COVID-19 pandemic.Radiat Environ Biophys. 2024 Mar;63(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/s00411-023-01056-x. Epub 2024 Jan 7. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2024. PMID: 38185693
-
Diagnostic reference level quantities for adult chest and abdomen-pelvis CT examinations: correlation with organ doses.Insights Imaging. 2023 Apr 7;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01403-y. Insights Imaging. 2023. PMID: 37024637 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation analysis of organ doses with dose metrics for patients undergoing organ dose-modulated head CT examinations.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 1;15(5):3849-3860. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2061. Epub 2025 Apr 28. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025. PMID: 40384677 Free PMC article.
-
Patient radiation safety in the intensive care unit.Br J Radiol. 2025 Sep 1;98(1173):1335-1343. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqaf147. Br J Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40591456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolved size-specific dose estimates for patient-specific organ doses from chest CT scans based on hybrid patient size vectors.Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025 Jun;48(2):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s13246-025-01522-4. Epub 2025 Feb 24. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025. PMID: 39992545
References
REFERENCES
-
- National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, “Medical Radiation Exposure of Patients in the United States: NCRP Report. No. 184.,” 2019.
-
- McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF. CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology. 2011;259(2):311-316.
-
- Computerized Imaging Reference Systems Inc., “ATOM Dosimetry Verification Phantoms.” [Online]. Available: http://www.cirsinc.com/products/radiation-therapy/atom-dosimetry-verific.... [Accessed: 30-Apr-2019].
-
- Zhang D, Padole A, Li X, et al. In vitro dose measurements in a human cadaver with abdomen/pelvis CT scans. Med Phys. 2014;41(9):1-9.
-
- Mueller JW, Vining DJ, Kyle Jones A, et al. In vivo CT dosimetry during CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(4):703-710.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical