Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;56(1):82-90.
doi: 10.1111/medu.14602. Epub 2021 Aug 24.

Towards equitable learning environments for medical education: Bias and the intersection of social identities

Affiliations

Towards equitable learning environments for medical education: Bias and the intersection of social identities

Naike Bochatay et al. Med Educ. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Context: Medical educators are increasingly paying attention to how bias creates inequities that affect learners across the medical education continuum. Such bias arises from learners' social identities. However, studies examining bias and social identities in medical education tend to focus on one identity at a time, even though multiple identities often interact to shape individuals' experiences.

Methods: This article examines prior studies on bias and social identity in medical education, focusing on three social identities that commonly elicit bias: race, gender and profession. By applying the lens of intersectionality, we aimed to generate new insights into intergroup relations and identify strategies that may be employed to mitigate bias and inequities across all social identities.

Results: Although different social identities can be more or less salient at different stages of medical training, they intersect and impact learners' experiences. Bias towards racial and gender identities affect learners' ability to reach different stages of medical education and influence the specialties they train in. Bias also makes it difficult for learners to develop their professional identities as they are not perceived as legitimate members of their professional groups, which influences interprofessional relations. To mitigate bias across all identities, three main sets of strategies can be adopted. These strategies include equipping individuals with skills to reflect upon their own and others' social identities; fostering in-group cohesion in ways that recognise intersecting social identities and challenges stereotypes through mentorship; and addressing intergroup boundaries through promotion of allyship, team reflexivity and conflict management.

Conclusions: Examining how different social identities intersect and lead to bias and inequities in medical education provides insights into ways to address these problems. This article proposes a vision for how existing strategies to mitigate bias towards different social identities may be combined to embrace intersectionality and develop equitable learning environments for all.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Burford B. Group processes in medical education: learning from social identity theory. Med Educ. 2012;46(2):143-152.
    1. Dovidio JF, Love A, Schellhaas FMH, Hewstone M. Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2017;20(5):606-620.
    1. Azmitia M, Syed M, Radmacher K. On the intersection of personal and social identities: introduction and evidence from a longitudinal study of emerging adults. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2008;120:1-16.
    1. Nicolas G, de la Fuente M, Fiske ST. Mind the overlap in multiple categorization: a review of crossed categorization, intersectionality, and multiracial perception. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2017;20(5):621-631.
    1. Abrams D, Hogg MA. Twenty years of group processes and intergroup relations research: a review of past progress and future prospects. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2017;20(5):561-569.

LinkOut - more resources