Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jan;59(1):26-32.
doi: 10.1002/uog.23746.

Diagnostic yield of next-generation sequencing in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic yield of next-generation sequencing in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency: systematic review and meta-analysis

M Pauta et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield of exome or genome sequencing (ES/GS) over chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency (NT) and no concomitant anomalies.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies describing ES/GS in fetuses with isolated increased NT. Inclusion criteria were: (1) study written in English; (2) more than two fetuses with increased NT > 99th percentile and no concomitant anomalies; and (3) a negative CMA result considered as the reference standard. Only positive variants identified on ES/GS that were classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic and determined to be causative of the fetal phenotype were considered. Risk was assessed as the pooled effect size by single-proportion analysis using random-effects modeling (weighted by inverse of variance).

Results: Eleven studies reporting on the diagnostic yield of ES/GS in fetuses with isolated increased NT > 99th percentile were identified and included 309 cases. All studies were high quality according to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Overall, a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant was identified on ES/GS in 15 fetuses, resulting in a pooled incremental yield of 4% (95% CI, 2-6%). Six (40%) of these fetuses had NT of 5 mm or more. The observed inheritance pattern was autosomal dominant in 12 cases, including four fetuses with Noonan syndrome, autosomal recessive in two cases and X-linked in one case.

Conclusions: There is a 4% incremental diagnostic yield of ES/GS over CMA in fetuses with increased NT > 99th percentile without a concomitant anomaly. It is unclear whether a NT cut-off higher than 3.5 mm may be more useful in case selection for ES/GS. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Keywords: diagnostic yield; exome sequencing; nuchal translucency; prenatal diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Souka AP, Von Kaisenberg CS, Hyett JA, Sonek JD, Nicolaides KH. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1005-1021.
    1. Borrell A, Mercade I, Casals E, Borobio V, Seres A, Soler A, Fortuny A, Cuckle H. Combining fetal nuchal fold thickness with second-trimester biochemistry to screen for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 941-945.
    1. Grande M, Jansen FAR, Blumenfeld YJ, Fisher A, Odibo AO, Haak MC, Borrell A. Genomic microarray in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and normal karyotype: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 650-658.
    1. Miranda J, Paz y Miño F, Borobio V, Badenas C, Rodriguez-Revenga L, Pauta M, Borrell A. Should cell-free DNA testing be used in pregnancy with increased fetal nuchal translucency? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 55: 645-651.
    1. Arigita M, Borrell A, Mula R, Sanchez A, Milà M, Gratacos E. Use of fetal nuchal translucency in the first trimester to predict single-gene disorders. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 1164-1168.

MeSH terms