Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 26;16(7):e0255266.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255266. eCollection 2021.

Urinary actin, as a potential marker of sepsis-related acute kidney injury: A pilot study

Affiliations

Urinary actin, as a potential marker of sepsis-related acute kidney injury: A pilot study

Dániel Ragán et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: A major complication of sepsis is the development of acute kidney injury (AKI). Recently, it was shown that intracellular actin released from damaged tissues appears in the urine of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Our aims were to measure urinary actin (u-actin) concentrations of septic and control patients and to test if u-actin levels could predict AKI and mortality.

Methods: Blood and urine samples were collected from septic and sepsis-related AKI patients at three time points (T1-3): T1: within 24 hours after admission; T2: second day morning; T3: third day morning of follow-up. Patients with malignancies needing palliative care, end-stage renal disease or kidney transplantation were excluded. Serum and u-actin levels were determined by quantitative Western blot. Patients were categorized by the Sepsis-3 and KDIGO AKI classifications.

Results: In our study, 17 septic, 43 sepsis-induced AKI and 24 control patients were enrolled. U-actin levels were higher in septic patients compared with controls during follow-up (p<0.001). At T1, the septic and sepsis-related AKI groups also showed differences (p<0.001), yet this increase was not statistically significant at T2 and T3. We also detected significantly elevated u-actin concentrations in AKI-2 and AKI-3 septic patients compared with AKI-1 septic patients (p<0.05) at T1 and T3, along with a significant increase in AKI-2 septic patients compared with AKI-1 septic patients at T2 (p<0.01). This tendency remained the same when referring u-actin to urine creatinine. Parameters of first-day septic patient samples could discriminate AKI from non-AKI state (AUC ROC, p<0.001): u-actin: 0.876; se-creatinine: 0.875. Derived cut-off value for u-actin was 2.63 μg/L (sensitivity: 86.0%, specificity: 82.4%).

Conclusion: U-actin may be a complementary diagnostic biomarker to se-creatinine in sepsis-related AKI while higher u-actin levels also seem to reflect the severity of AKI. Further investigations may elucidate the importance of u-actin release in sepsis-related AKI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Urinary actin in sepsis.
U-actin levels of control and septic patients (A) along with sepsis and sepsis-related AKI patients (B) during follow-up. n: sample count. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Urinary actin in sepsis-related AKI.
U-actin (A) and u-actin/u-creatinine (B) levels of the individual sepsis-related AKI stages during follow-up. n: sample count. *p<0.05; **p<0.01.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Survival and predictive power of urinary actin.
U-actin levels in survivor and non-survivor septic patients based on 30-day mortality during follow-up (A). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of admission laboratory parameters for distinguishing sepsis from sepsis-related AKI (B). n: sample count. n.s.: non-significant.

References

    1. Kumar G, Kumar N, Taneja A, Kaleekal T, Tarima S, McGinley E, et al.. Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000–2007). Chest. 2011;140(5):1223–31. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0352 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stoller J, Halpin L, Weis M, Aplin B, Qu W, Georgescu C, et al.. Epidemiology of severe sepsis: 2008–2012. Journal of critical care. 2016;31(1):58–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.09.034 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L, Murphy DJ, Seymour CW, Iwashyna TJ, et al.. Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009–2014. Jama. 2017;318(13):1241–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al.. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). Jama. 2016;315(8):801–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al.. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive care medicine. 2017;43(3):304–77. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms