Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;54(4):505-521.
doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.185. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections

Affiliations
Review

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Endoscopic Management of Peripancreatic Fluid Collections

Chi Hyuk Oh et al. Clin Endosc. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided intervention has gradually become a standard treatment for peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). However, it is difficult to popularize the procedure in Korea because of restrictions on insurance claims regarding the use of endoscopic accessories, as well as the lack of standardized Korean clinical practice guidelines. The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) appointed a Task Force to develope medical guidelines by referring to the manual for clinical practice guidelines development prepared by the National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Previous studies on PFCs were searched, and certain studies were selected with the help of experts. Then, a set of key questions was selected, and treatment guidelines were systematically reviewed. Answers to these questions and recommendations were selected via peer review. This guideline discusses endoscopic management of PFCs and makes recommendations on Indications for the procedure, pre-procedural preparations, optimal approach for drainage, procedural considerations (e.g., types of stent, advantages and disadvantages of plastic and metal stents, and accessories), adverse events of endoscopic intervention, and procedural quality issues. This guideline was reviewed by external experts and suggests best practices recommended based on the evidence available at the time of preparation. This will be revised as necessary to address advances and changes in technology and evidence obtained in clinical practice and future studies.

Keywords: Complications; Drainage; Endoscopy; Pancreatitis; Pseudocyst.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Search flow chart.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis with acute peripancreatic fluid collections (APFC) in the left anterior pararenal space.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
A pseudocyst in the lesser sac.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Acute necrotic collection with acute necrotizing pancreatitis involving the body and tail of the pancreas.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Walled of necrosis. A large liquefied collection with air bubbles in the bed of the pancreas.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Banks PA, Freeman ML, Gastroenterology PPC of the AC of Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG. 2006;101:2379–2400. - PubMed
    1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102–111. - PubMed
    1. Julian PT Higgins, Sally Green. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 5.1.0, Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Lundon: Cochrane; [Internet] [updated 2011 Mar; cited 2021 Jul 20]. Available from: http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org.
    1. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–605. - PubMed
    1. Whiting P, Rutjes AWS, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PMM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:25. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources