Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;166(4):669-675.
doi: 10.1177/01945998211029184. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

COVID-19 in the Clinic: Human Testing of an Aerosol Containment Mask for Endoscopic Clinic Procedures

Affiliations

COVID-19 in the Clinic: Human Testing of an Aerosol Containment Mask for Endoscopic Clinic Procedures

Elisabeth H Ference et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To create an aerosol containment mask (ACM) for common otolaryngologic endoscopic procedures that also provides nanoparticle-level protection to patients.

Study design: Prospective feasibility study .

Setting: In-person testing with a novel ACM.

Methods: The mask was designed in Solidworks and 3D printed. Measurements were made on 10 healthy volunteers who wore the ACM while reading the Rainbow Passage repeatedly and performing a forced cough or sneeze at 5-second intervals over 1 minute with an endoscope in place.

Results: There was a large variation in the number of aerosol particles generated among the volunteers. Only the sneeze task showed a significant increase compared with normal breathing in the 0.3-µm particle size when compared with a 1-tailed t test (P = .013). Both the 0.5-µm and 2.5-µm particle sizes showed significant increases for all tasks, while the 2 largest particle sizes, 5 and 10 µm, showed no significant increase (both P < .01). With the suction off, 3 of 30 events (2 sneeze events and 1 cough event) had increases in particle counts, both inside and outside the mask. With the suction on, 2 of 30 events had an increase in particle counts outside the mask without a corresponding increase in particle counts inside the mask. Therefore, these fluctuations in particle counts were determined to be due to random fluctuation in room particle levels.

Conclusion: ACM will accommodate rigid and flexible endoscopes plus instruments and may prevent the leakage of patient-generated aerosols, thus avoiding contamination of the room and protecting health care workers from airborne contagions.

Level of evidence: 2.

Keywords: COVID-19; Rainbow Passage; aerosol production; cough; endoscopy; laryngoscopy; nasal endoscopy; negative-pressure mask; sneeze; virus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Competing interests: None

Sponsorships: None.

Funding source: Keck School of Medicine COVID-19 Funding Program supported by the W.M. Keck Foundation

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mask testing setup in a human volunteer. (a) Mask design. (b) Setup for human volunteer. (c) Human volunteer undergoing rigid endoscopy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Box plots of cumulative particle counts at sensor 1 measured over 1 minute in human volunteers wearing the aerosol containment mask with no suction. Abbreviations: C, cough; N, normal breathing; R, Rainbow; S, sneeze.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The 0.3-µm particle counts for a representative healthy volunteer for normal breathing, Rainbow Passage, coughing, and sneezing. Inside aerosol containment mask (sensor 1) and outside (sensor 2).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Particle count as a function of time for 2 volunteers. Sensor 1 is inside the mask. Sensor 2 is outside the mask. The leaks are marked by (↔) on both sensor plots.

References

    1. Rameau A, Lee M, Enver N, Sulica L. Is office laryngoscopy an aerosol-generating procedure? Laryngoscope. 2020;130(11):2637-2642. doi:10.1002/lary.28973 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Workman AD, Jafari A, Welling DB, et al.. Airborne aerosol generation during endonasal procedures in the era of COVID-19: risks and recommendations. Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2020;163(3):465-470. doi:10.1177/0194599820931805 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al.. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1564-1567. doi:10.1056/nejmc2004973 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoffman HT, Miller RM, Walsh JE, Stegall HR, Diekema DJ. Negative pressure face shield for flexible laryngoscopy in the COVID-19 era. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020;5(4):718-726. doi:10.1002/lio2.437 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khoury T, Lavergne P, Chitguppi C, et al.. Aerosolized particle reduction: a novel cadaveric model and a negative airway pressure respirator (NAPR) system to protect health care workers from COVID-19. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(1):151-155. doi:10.1177/0194599820929275 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types