Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;48(10):6152-6159.
doi: 10.1002/mp.15132. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

Dosimetry on first clinical dark-field chest radiography

Affiliations

Dosimetry on first clinical dark-field chest radiography

Manuela Frank et al. Med Phys. 2021 Oct.

Erratum in

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose characteristic for patient examinations at the first clinical X-ray dark-field chest radiography system and to determine whether the effective patient dose is within a clinically acceptable dose range.

Methods: A clinical setup for grating-based dark-field chest radiography was constructed and commissioned, operating at a tube voltage of 70 kVp. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements were conducted using an anthropomorphic phantom modeling the reference person to obtain a conversion coefficient relating dose area product (DAP) to effective patient dose at the dark-field system. For 92 patients, the DAP values for posterior-anterior measurements were collected at the dark-field system. Using the previously determined conversion coefficient, the effective dose was calculated.

Results: A reference person, modeled by an anthropomorphic phantom, receives an effective dose of 35 µSv. For the examined patients, a mean effective dose of 39 µSv was found.

Conclusions: The effective dose at the clinical dark-field radiography system, generating both attenuation and dark-field images, is within the range of reported standard dose values for chest radiography.

Keywords: TLD; X-ray dark-field; dosimetry; radiation dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ferkol T, Schraufnagel D. The global burden of respiratory disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:404-406.
    1. World Health Organization. Global Health Estimates 2016: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region. 2018:2000-2016.
    1. Barreiro TJ, Perillo I. An approach to interpreting spirometry. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69:1107-1114.
    1. Kruger R, Flynn MJ, Judy PF, Cagnon CH, Seibert JA. Effective dose assessment for participants in the national lung screening trial undergoing posteroanterior chest radio-graphic examinations. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:142-146.
    1. Vilar-Palop J, Vilar J, Hernández-Aguado I, González-Alvarez I, Lumbreras B. Up-dated effective doses in radiology. J Radiol Prot. 2016;36:975-990.

LinkOut - more resources